SB423 UPDATE: Governor Schweitzer, MMJ Bill is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Montana NORML Action Alert: Please Veto SB 423

UPDATE:

UPDATE Judge’s Ruling on SB-423 Injunction June 30, 2011 PDF UPDATE

May 14, 2011: News UPDATE for SB423 Rallies, Protests, Advertising and SB423 becoming LAW!!!

 

Links:

Fastest way to determine cannabis seedling sex!

Peer Reviewed Research

MMJ Clinics / Doctors Recommendations

MMJ Dispensaries/Caregivers: Find Them Here

MMJ Strains / Varieties: Find Them Here Potency Tested

Grow Buddy Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD test kit

Grow Buddy Instructional Video

Grow Buddy Replacement T.L.C. Supplies

Plant DNA Collection Kit

Montana Biotech Products and Services

Cannabinoid Facts

Grow Buddy™ T.L.C. test kit

Specialist Want Regulations / Oversight of Medical Marijuana Analysis Labs, Montana Biotech Embraces Open Dialog

Cannabis Cannabinoid Analytics at Home T.L.C. Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD, CBN Medical Marijuana Cannabinoid Fingerprint Test Kit by Montana Biotech

Cannalytics™ Cannabinoid Fingerprinting Test by Alpha Nova vs Grow Buddy™ at Home THC, CBD, CBN Test Kit by Montana Biotech Comparing Two Competing Thin Layer Chromatography T.L.C Methods

Grow Buddy Replacement Thin Layer Chromatography TLC Parts, Pieces, and Accessories, from Montana Biotech

QUALTITATIVE vs. QAUNTITATIVE Analysis of Cannabis THC, CBD, CBN Cannabinoid Levels

Call Montana Biotech today for more information on setting up a Grow Room Help or consultation!

 Cell: 406-600-6871

E-Mail: MontanaBiotech@gmail.com

Twitter: @MontanaBiotech

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/joseph.lacerenza


 

SB423 Opposition Rallies, Protests, Marches, Gatherings, Assembly UPDATES: Lawsuits status May 10, 2011

UPDATE from: http://www.StopSB423.com/

 What we are doing…

Our Defense is not a secret, and our legislature has been educated on what we are able to do to combat this REPEAL in DISGUISE…they are counting on the divisions within our community, because they know that if we would work together, we could defeat them.

We have a four stage missile that we have launched, and every person in this country can help at each stage. The efforts include:

  • Attempting to get the Governor to VETO SB423 & trying to convince those legislators who don’t want medical marijuana, to change their minds.

  • Court action against the State of Montana, including an injunction that halts SB423, keeping the existing laws in place.

  • Petitions and signature drives, all over Montana, that will effectively IMMEDIATELY repeal the SB423 once it does become law.

  • Writing our own initiative that will provide Montanans with the available access to the medicine we need.

UPDATE May 11, 2011: Events Around Montana to FIGHT SB432!

Rәvolution… Wed, May 11th, 4pm

Missoula MMGA Meeting… Wed, May 11th, 6:30pm

Free Event Filled with Information about SB423…  Fri, May 13th, 4pm

Montana Medical Marijuana Backers… Fri, May 13th, 4:20pm


UPDATE May 10, 2011: Montana NORML

Friends,
Another short update after a long day:

We — all of you — came through for the MTCIA’s initial fundraising
goal, $50,000 to hire superstar attorney James Goetz. In 4 days!

This was phase one, a test to show that we could come together, unify
behind a common goal, and get something big done. We did it!

More here:
http://www.mtcia.org/2011/05/enormous-statewide-support-for-medical-marijuana-patients-and-against-sb-423/

MTCIA (http://mtcia.org) will need your ongoing donations to complete
the lawsuit, assist the signature gathering campaign, and more. Stay tuned.

By the way, MTCIA has a new mailing address:

Montana Cannabis Industry Association
PO Box 9085
Missoula, MT 59807

Thanks to all who came out to the Global Marijuana March in Missoula
over the weekend. Video of the kickoff here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frCpxCw4AQY

UPCOMING EVENTS to FIGHT SB423!!!

From various folks out in the world:

Wednesday, May 11, in Helena:
“May 11 from 4pm to 7pm we are going to protest (peacefully) on the lawn
and ask the govenor to veto SB423 this is our last chance before it goes
into law !”
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=221420067869048

Friday, May 13th, Bozeman:
http://www.stonehousegardensmt.com/2011/05/09/458/
“Prescription drug companies are threatened by the medical marijuana
industry so are funding some of our politicians to essentially bribe
them into rejecting medical marijuana laws, all in an effort to keep
their excessive profits.”

Friday, May 13th, Missoula:
Come out for this FREE event filled with information with regards to
SB-423 – Legal Action – Referendum. First hour is set aside for
networking with each other (NOW is the time to get to know & work with
each other). Guest Speakers to include Senator Dave Wanzenried &
introduction of the MCIA (Montana Cannabis Industry Assn.) board.
For vendor spot information, contact Ed Docter or visit
http://mtcia.org/contact asap!
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=202189413152521

Thanks for all each of you do to help.



John Masterson
Montana NORML – Working to reform marijuana laws in Montana since 1998.
Web:  http://montananorml.org
Blog: http://blog.montananorml.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/mtnorml
Twitter:  http://twitter.com/mtnorml
Get Legislative Action Alerts: http://montanadrugpolicy.org

Montana NORML could not exist without your support. Join us today: http://www.montananorml.org/join/

Hello Friends and Fellow Medical Marijuana Supporters!

We are holding a public assembly this Friday, the 13th, to draw attention to the 300 people who die annually in Montana from prescription drug overdoses, most of them children.

Prescription drug companies are threatened by the medical marijuana industry so are funding some of our politicians to essentially bribe them into rejecting medical marijuana laws, all in an effort to keep their excessive profits.

We are asking everyone to please come to the assembly and bring as many friends as you can. If you are able to, we would like people to bring coffins to provide a visual for the people dying from these dangerous drugs. Most deaths related to prescription drugs are kids 18 and under so a variety of sizes will really show that. Coffins can be made out of any materials that you have. Here is a website for simple coffin building: http://wayneofthewoods.com/coffin%202.html

If you cannot attend, please donate whatever you can. We will have horse drawn carriages to pull the coffins and will need any donations to help fund those.

We will start in the KO’s parking lot (map direction link below) at 10 am and continue down Main Street in a progression of people, horse- drawn carriages and coffins. We will then assemble in the lawn of the Courthouse, with the coffins, and will have informative speakers. This will be a peaceful and quiet protest.

Please join us!

We would really appreciate a R.S.V.P. so that we can prepare for the turnout.

Hope to see you all there!

Also, we encourage all of you to check out this website: http://www.mtcia.org. Please make any donation that you can to support the fight against SB 423. Get Involved!!

KO’s Directions: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=KO+club+bozeman&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-Address&oe=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wl

UPDATE: 5-2-2011 SB423! Provided by John Masterson, Montana NORML

Friends,

A few days ago I told you that the governor seemed to be pleased with SB 423, a bill that would demolish the legal cannabis industry in Montana and make it more difficult for patients to have safe and reliable access. Since I wrote those words, he has stated in no uncertain terms that he intends to allow the bill to become law. It is scheduled to become the new law of the land on July 1st.

An at-a-glance summary of the new law for patients, caregivers, and doctors, is here: http://blog.montananorml.org/2011/04/30/highlights-of-montanas-new-medical-marijuana-law/ (please read this)

Activist leaders across the state are mobilizing to stop SB 423 from becoming law. This involves multiple strategies:

Persuade the governor to veto. He has said he will not, but we should keep pushing until he does. Read below for how to do so.

File legal actions to block the law from taking effect based on constitutional objections. More on that front soon. If you know about such an effort, let me know so I can help coordinate. It could be really bad to have bunch of separate efforts!

Collect signatures to block the law from taking effect and allow the voters of Montana to decide whether SB 423 is the right way to regulate medical marijuana.
Here are a few details on each effort:

1. Veto

This is a best case scenario. If the governor vetoes SB 423, we are left with the existing law — subject to any new administrative rules that the state provides, a function that has always been available to them, but they chose not to use. We need to pressure the governor to take this option — veto the bill, and create a regulatory infrastructure via administrative rules. He has the power to do this.

Tell him so:

Click here: http://www.montanadrugpolicy.org/alert/46

Click here: http://governor.mt.gov/contact/commentsform.asp

Call: (406) 444-3111 and urge the governor to veto SB 423 and
regulate medical marijuana via administrative rules.

Write a letter to the editor of your local paper. These messages matter!

Show up:

·         Whitefish — Thursday May 5th, 11:30AM, Whitefish Performing Arts Center. The governor will be attending this event, and we would like to see a mass of people, dressed in their Sunday best, politely holding “VETO SB 423” signs. Contact our friend Ed Docter to coordinate: ed.tamarack@gmail.com or see the Facebook event page here.

2. Legal Action

It is possible that the right legal action, launched in the right jurisdiction, could prevent or delay implementation of SB 423.

My gut feeling is that there are probably 10+ big growers out there, with a bundle of cash and a top-shelf lawyer ready to do this — but, please, you guys, slow down, and consider this:

If multiple suits are launched in different jurisdictions that argue some of the same points, it’s possible that the suits could be combined to be heard in one court — which might be the worst court we could be in.

So, if you and your attorney are hot-to-trot to sue, please let me know so I can help coordinate the various efforts into one which is strategically and legally sound. I want to connect the experts into a team, so we can win.

3. Signatures

Montana law allows us the possibility of blocking an act of the legislature if we gather enough signatures. It’s a big number, something like 100,000 signatures.

If it comes to this, we will need to recruit 1000 signature gatherers. If you would like to volunteer to lead regional signature gathering, please email norml@montananorml.org and let us know — include your city and phone number and any special skills or resources you have (like a crew of 10 volunteers ready to help, for example). If you can pledge to gather 20 sigs, that counts! Let us know.

We cannot gather signatures yet. It is a legal process, which is unlikely to be complete before June. Sit tight, the delay is absolutely unavoidable.

There is a whirlwind of activity statewide to combat the new law. Please forward this message to your friends. Things are happening, and we’ll need your help to succeed. Let us know if you are part of a regional group that intends to be involved and we’ll help coordinate.

Onwards!

John Masterson
Montana NORML – Working to reform marijuana laws in Montana.
Web: http://montananorml.org
Blog: http://blog.montananorml.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Montana-NORML/178715305628
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mtnorml

Donate to Cannabis Research at Montana Biotech

Montana — Calling the newly passed bill overhauling the state’s medical marijuana lawunconstitutional on its face,” Gov. Brian Schweitzer said Wednesday that he wants to issue an amendatory veto to fix the parts he considers legally defective.

“I’d like to amend it, that’s what I would like to do, and we’ll see what it looks like when it gets here,” Schweitzer said. “The bill as written is not going to survive the courts.”

His comments came after the Senate approved Senate Bill 423, by Sen. Jeff Essmann, R-Billings, by 33-17. The House approved it 70-30. SB423 now will be sent to Schweitzer, who earlier vetoed House Bill 161, by Speaker Mike Milburn, R-Cascade, that would have repealed the 2004 voter-passed medical marijuana law.

Montana voters approved a 2004 ballot initiative by 62 percent to 38 percent to legalize the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

Montana now has nearly 30,000 medical marijuana users. Many patients are supplied by large-scale growing operations with storefronts, and some were registered en masse by traveling cannabis caravans, where doctors prescribed the drug to hundreds of patients after brief screenings.

SB423 prohibits any sale of marijuana by asking for the drug to be given to patients free of charge, on compassionate grounds. It severely limits the number of people growers can provide to, from unlimited to just three.

Doctors would be required to establish lasting relationships with patients before prescribing use and would be put under supervision if they suggest the treatment to more than 15 patients a year.

Applicants who claim to have chronic pain would have to present objective proof, such as an X-ray, or a second doctor’s opinion confirming that person’s condition.

Schweitzer criticized the House for tabling in committee House Bill 68, by Sen. Diane Sands, D-Missoula. The bill was proposed by a bipartisan interim committee after much study and many hearings last year.

“They threw that in the garbage and now they’re going to send me this (SB) 423, which everybody’s who’s read it says, ‘Oh yeah, it’s unconstitutional,’ ” he said. Schweitzer said he doesn’t believe the bill will survive a legal challenge. “I’m kind of disgusted right now,” he said.

If Schweitzer receives the bill before lawmakers adjourn, possibly Thursday, he can make an amendatory veto suggesting changes to the bill that the House and Senate would vote on.

If he gets the bill after they leave, Schweitzer has three choices: sign it into law, veto it or let it become law without his signature.

Schweitzer said he hopes he has a chance to suggest changes to SB423.

“Unfortunately, if they don’t allow us to get our amendments up to them, it’s likely to not survive legal challenges,” he said. “It seems to us unconstitutional on its face.”

Essmann said later that he received a series of amendments from Schweitzer’s staff that the governor wants to make to SB423. He said he agreed with House leaders to review the suggested amendments together and decide what they want to do.

Essmann said all three branches of government get to offer their opinions on the constitutionality of legislation.

Schweitzer questioned the provision that says that if people receive medical marijuana cards, they must have them on their possession at all times, regardless of whether they have marijuana on them. In addition, cardholders’ names and addresses are provided to local law enforcement officials, who have the right to search their homes at any time.

That violates your constitutional rights (against) illegal search,” he said.

Essmann defended this provision, saying it’s similar to implied consent in driving while intoxicated laws in which people suspected of drunken driving are asked to blow into a breath machine.

If patients are growing their own medical marijuana, Essmann said, “I don’t think law enforcement is going to be coming in in the middle of the night.”

Schweitzer also said he believes the bill violates the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA.

“If you’re taking oxycontin or penicillin or, for God’s sake, even aspirin, that is your own personal health care records,” he said. But HB423 is “demanding” that the fact that someone is using medical marijuana and “be turned over to law enforcement in every town.”

“There’s another problem with it, and I think it’s a fundamental problem,” Schweitzer said. “Under this bill, I will guar-an-dang-tee you that there will be more illegal marijuana (that) makes it to the alley under this proposal than we currently have because now you’re going to have 4,000, 5,000, 6,000 people growing their own. It’s not possible to monitor all of them.”

Schweitzer said the bill would be better off allowing a few centralized growers that are “heavily regulated and heavily taxed, bonded and insured, so that none of this stuff makes it to the illegal chains.”

“I mean, does someone with a straight face think you can have 5,000 people growing their own and none of it makes it to high schools or to college dorm rooms?” he said.

Essmann, however, said a new letter from the U.S. attorney for Colorado makes it clear that the U.S. Justice Department has legal problems with states using centralized marijuana growing operations. He said the Senate had proposed larger growing operations, but the House opposed the idea.

Schweitzer criticized the Legislature for managing to “squander away” most of the 90-day legislative session before sending him the bill. He said lawmakers already know it’s unconstitutional, which is why they put a “severability clause” in it saying if a court strikes down part of the bill, the rest stands. Severability clauses are common in complex bills.

“Why don’t you just pass something that works, that’s constitutional and that can survive the test of time?” he asked.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Billings Gazette, The (MT)
Author: Charles S. Johnson, Gazette State Bureau
Published: April 27, 2011
Copyright: 2011 The Billings Gazette
Contact: speakup@billingsgazette.com
Website: http://www.billingsgazette.com/
URL: http://drugsense.org/url/bAxCUlTL

CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml

Action Alert: Please Veto or Transform SB 423 from conference committee

SB 423 would stick Montana with the very worst “medical marijuana” law in the country.  It represents “repeal in disguise,” and is filled with arbitrary and extreme requirements intended to make it virtually impossible for patients with chronic pain to become legal – and to make it extremely unlikely that any patient will have reasonably reliable and consistent access to medical-grade cannabis.  Any physician making more than 15 recommendations within a year gets investigated, and pays for the investigation.  Chronic pain patients need two different physicians to do a complete exam unless they have “proof” of the “etiology” of their pain.  No one can grow for more than three patients, and people can’t grow cooperatively or efficiently.  You grow either for infused (non-smokeable) products only, or for “bud” – not both.  All growing and production must be “free.”  Labs for quality control are essentially banned.

Contact Governor Schweitzer and tell him that this bill, as is, is unworkable!

Governor@Mt.gov

 SB 423 is literally designed to fail patients – not to work as voters intended.

In your own words, please urge the Governor to Vote NO on the HB 423 “free conference committee report.”  Explain why provisions like these do NOT fulfill voter intent, to make it possible for patients to use cannabis responsibly as medicine.  A recent poll by Mason-Dixon found that 87% of Montana voters want either no change or regulatory reform of the medical marijuana law – they DON’T want “repeal in disguise.”

WE LOVED THIS SCHWEITZER!!!!

THAT IS WHY WE ELECTED YOU!!!

Demacratic Senator David Wanzenried for Governor 2012! Just Another Reason to LOVE Him, Opposition to SB423

By Christian Hauser
chauser@keci.com

POSTED: 8:13 pm MDT April 26, 2011

HELENA, Mont. — It looks like the legislature has finally reached agreement on medical marijuana reforms. With just days remaining in the session, both houses are backing a bill that would drastically overhaul marijuana laws.It was heated debate in both houses over the last ditch effort to reform Montana’s medical marijuana laws. Senate bill 423 overwhelmingly passed both houses Tuesday. The bill takes the money and the industry out of medical marijuana. It also says a person must grow their own marijuana or find someone to volunteer to grow it for them. The bill would likely lead to a significant reduction of the state’s nearly 30,000 legal marijuana users supplied by large grow operations.Rep. Tom Berry (R-Roundup) says, “The initiative, I-148, when the voters voted for it, this brings it back to what the voters voted for. They did not vote for big shops. They did not vote for people selling it like it is. They voted so people could access it and that means for themselves.”Sen. Dave Wanzenried (D-Missoula) disagrees. Wanzenried says, “I don’t think it represents public opinion at all. Does it represent the concerns out there? Absolutely. And are there things we need to do to tighten up the system? Absolutely. But we are going to throw thousands of people with legitimate needs under the bus with this bill.Wanzenried thinks there are many questions the bill doesn’t answer. He says, “People who want to put an artificial constraint on it by saying you’re going to have to have a volunteer grow medical marijuana is absurd. There’s lots of people who will have it available illegally for them. And I don’t know how they’re supposed to find out who can legally grow it for them in the first place. That was one of the questions that was unanswered.”Rep. Berry knows the bill is not perfect, but also says the state must to severely cut down on the people with access to medical marijuana. Berry says, “I think the bill’s a good bill. It’s not a perfect bill, but I think it’s going to bring some side boards on the situation and get some more control to the medical marijuana situation. Which I think is out of control.”The bill still has to be voted on again in each house. It is expected to pass by the same margins it did Tuesday. Gov. Brian Schweitzer already said he plans to make changes to it, but observers say it’s too late for that. That has many worried Senate Bill 423 will turn people who can’t find someone to grow their marijuana into criminals.

Hemp for Victory, Reefer Madness, The BEST Cannabis / Marijuana Propaganda Films / Movies of ALL TIME!

Hemp for Victory! (1942)

Hemp for Victory is the BEST pro cannabis propaganda film EVER made, ever! It’s obscurity is what makes the film seem like a FAKE. BUT, this is a real film produced by the same government that got rid of cannabis years before its filming. Hemp for Victory is the first look at how ubiquitous cannabis hemp was in the US and around the world. Sit back hit the bong, grab some munchies and enjoy, Hemp for Victory.

Reefer Madness (1932)

Reefer Madness is the BEST anti cannabis propaganda movie EVER made, ever! The sheer hilarity is missed during its debut, but here in 2012 one can see the entertainment value of the”Reefer Madness” mind set. Strange as it maybe, times are changing. In 1937 cannabis was essentially outlawed by passage of the Marihuana Tax Act. Today, there are at least 4 states, Montana, Colorado, California, and Washington State trying for cannabis legalization through ballot measures for the 2012 election. Reefer Madness still exists, but we are closer to justice then I have ever seen in my few years on this planet.

 

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS!!!

If you have a qualifying medical condition, but cant afford the cost of MMJ registration, we may be able to help.

Wholesale prices are available for all of our products including a 90 day buy back guarantee. Please  feel free to contact us 24/7 with any questions.

Cell: 406-600-6871

Hemp for Victory,  Reefer Madness, The BEST Cannabis / Marijuana Propaganda Films / Movies of ALL TIME!

Cannabis Documentaries Cannabinoid Facts Marijuana Peer Reviewed Research Links

Cannabis TV Documentaries:

Montana PBS Special Clearing the Smoke: The Science of Cannabis

Hemp for Victory

Reefer Madness

Marijuana ( Marihuana ) The Devil’s Weed Cannabis Propaganda film (1936)

Marihuana The Assassin of Youth 1935 Anti-Marijuana Propaganda Film

The BEST Cannabis / Marijuana Propaganda Films / Movies of ALL TIME!

Marijuana: A Chronic History Presented by the History Channel

NGC’s Drugs Inc.: Marijuana

NGC’s Marijuana Nation

PBS’ Botany of Desire

CNBC’s Marijuana Inc.

TEA Party Eat your Heart Out!! The Bundy’s Were Here 1st!!

Links:

!!SALE for September!! Grow Buddy Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD, Cannabis Cannabinoids Test Kit !!SALE for September!!

Peer Reviewed Research

MMJ Clinics / Doctors Recommendations

MMJ Dispensaries/Caregivers: Find Them Here

MMJ Strains / Varieties: Find Them Here Potency Tested

Ed Rosenthal Runs For President in 2012? Stephen’s Colbert SuperPac Funding?

Fastest way to determine cannabis seedling sex!

Grow Buddy Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD test kit

Grow Buddy Instructional Video

Grow Buddy Replacement T.L.C. Supplies

Plant DNA Collection Kit

Montana Biotech Products and Services

Cannabinoid Facts

Specialist Want Regulations / Oversight of Medical Marijuana Analysis Labs, Montana Biotech Embraces Open Dialog

Cannalytics™ Cannabinoid Fingerprinting Test by Alpha Nova vs Grow Buddy™ at Home THC, CBD, CBN Test Kit by Montana Biotech Comparing Two Competing Thin Layer Chromatography T.L.C Methods

QUALTITATIVE vs. QAUNTITATIVE Analysis of Cannabis THC, CBD, CBN Cannabinoid Levels

Ed Rosenthal and the Party-Party’s Platform for America 2012!

A Little Ed History and Education! Wiki Style!

Peer Reviewed Research:

ADD /ADHD, Medical Marijuana and its potential Treatment.

Addiction Risk-Physical of using Medical Marijuana.

Alcoholism and Medical Marijuana.

ALS, Lou Gehrig’s Disease Medical Cannabis Therapy

Cannabis Marijuana Use and AMOTIVATIONAL SYNDROME

Alzheimer’s Disease Progression Prevention Cannabinoids

Medical Cannabis Marijuana and ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES of Cannabinoids

ANTI-BACTERIAL PROPERTIES of Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol,  Cannabichromene, Cannabigerol, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabinol

Medical Cannabis Marijuana and ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES of Cannabinoids

Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol CBD,  Cannabichromene CBC, Cannabigerol CBG, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol THC, Cannabinol CBN and Cannabis Marijuana Antioxidant Properties

Cannabis Marijuana and ANXIOLYTIC, Also Known as Antipanic or Antianxiety Agents, EFFECTS of CBD Cannabidiol for Treatment of Anxiety

APPETITE STIMULANT Medical Marijuana Cannabis and It’s Effects on Hunger the Munchies

ARTHRITIS Cannabis Marijuana and the Effects of Cannabinoids for Treatment

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS (card holders)!!!

Contact us to be YOUR Provider/Marijuana Infused Products Provider (MIPP)

Call: 406-600-6871

Call Montana Biotech today for more information on setting up a Grow Room, Help or consultation!

Cell: 406-600-6871

E-Mail: MontanaBiotech@gmail.com

Twitter: @MontanaBiotech

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/joseph.lacerenza

Donate to Cannabis Research at Montana Biotech

Hemp for Victory 1942 U.S. WWII Propaganda Film and State by State Industrial Hemp Laws

Hemp for Victory is the BEST pro cannabis propaganda film EVER made, ever! It’s obscurity is what makes the film seem like a FAKE. BUT, this is a real film produced by the same government that got rid of cannabis years before its filming. Hemp for Victory is the first look at how ubiquitous cannabis hemp was in the US and around the world. Sit back hit the bong, grab some munchies and enjoy, Hemp for Victory.

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS!!!

If you have a qualifying medical condition, but cant afford the cost of MMJ registration, we may be able to help.

Wholesale prices are available for all of our products including a 90 day buy back guarantee. Please  feel free to contact us 24/7 with any questions.

Cell: 406-600-6871

State Hemp Laws

 Arkansas | California | Colorado | Hawaii | Illinois | Kentucky | Maine | Maryland | Minnesota | Montana | New Mexico | North Carolina | North Dakota | Oregon | Vermont | Virginia | West Virginia

Arkansas

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1999
Summary: The Arkansas Senate approved Senate Resolution 13 resolving that the “University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture conduct studies regarding the uses and economic benefits … of industrial hemp … [and] report its findings to the House and senate Interim Committees on Agriculture and Economic Development.” No state study appears to have been completed.

California

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1999
Summary: The California Assembly approved House Resolution 32 resolving the Legislature “consider action to revise the legal status of industrial hemp to allow for its growth in California.” This legislation also advises the Legislature “consider directing the University of California, the California State University, and other state agencies to prepare studies in conjunction with private industry on the cultivation, processing and marketing of industrial hemp.” No state study appears to have been completed.

Colorado

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2010
Summary: HJR10-1027 — Concerning the recognition of industrial hemp as a valuable agricultural commodity, and, in connection therewith, urging Congress to clarify the federal definition of industrial hemp, facilitate domestic production of industrial hemp, and remove barriers to state regulation of the production of industrial hemp.

Hawaii

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2001
Summary: The Hawaii Legislature approved House Bill 32 allowing “privately funded” hemp research to be conducted in Hawaii. This legislation allows such research only when the “state department of public safety issues a controlled substance registration, and the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration issues a federally-controlled substance registration for research on the agronomic potential of industrial hemp.” This legislation defines industrial hemp as “marijuana that contains 0.3 percent or less of THC.” An initial test plot of industrial hemp was cultivated in accordance with this law in spring 2000.

Year Passed: 1996
Summary: The Hawaii Legislature approved House Resolution 71 and House Concurrent Resolution 63 resolving “to conduct a study on the economic potential, problems, and other related matters of growing nonpsychoactive industrial cannabis hemp as an agricultural product in Hawaii.” The state study was completed in January 1997.

Illinois

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1999
Summary: The Illinois Senate approved Senate Resolution 49 establishing a task force to “study the economic viability of industrial hemp … and report its findings and recommendations to the Illinois Senate.” The state study was completed in January 2000.

Kentucky

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2001
Summary: The Kentucky Legislature approved House Bill 100 establishing an industrial hemp research program to study hemp as an agricultural product in Kentucky. This legislation creates an industrial hemp commission to monitor the program, issue a report, and make recommendations to the Governor. This state study remains ongoing.

Maine

Laws Authorizing Commercial Hemp Cultivation

Year Passed: 2009
Summary: LD 1159, An Act Relating to Industrial Hemp allows a person to grow industrial hemp if that person holds a license issued by the Commissioner of Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources and the hemp is grown under a federal permit in compliance with the conditions of that permit.

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2003
Summary: The Maine Legislature approved L.D. 53 directing the Maine Department of Agriculture to “develop a study to explore the feasibility and desirability of industrial hemp production.” The legislation requires the Commissioner of Agriculture to “obtain all federal permits necessary to legally grow hemp for fiber or seed production prior to importing any nonsterilized industrial hemp seeds capable of germination into the State.” This study remains ongoing.

Maryland

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2000
Summary: The Maryland Legislature approved House Bill 1250 establishing a four and one-half year industrial hemp research program to study the growth and marketing of hemp. This legislation requires the “Secretary of Agriculture to administer the pilot program in consultation with specified state and federal agencies … to ensure safe cultivation of industrial hemp.” This legislation also establishes licensing procedures for researchers who wish to grow hemp for research purposes. This state study remains ongoing.

Minnesota

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1999
Summary: The Minnesota Legislature approved language in the House Omnibus State Government Finance Bill mandating the Governor, in consultation with the commissioners of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Trade and Economic Development to submit an application for federal permits to authorize the growing of experimental and demonstration plots of industrial hemp. This legislation also directs the commissioners to establish standards and procedures for researchers who wish to grow hemp for research purposes.

Montana

Laws Authorizing Commercial Hemp Cultivation

Year Passed: 2001
Summary: The Montana Legislature approved Senate Bill 261 recognizing industrial hemp having no more than 0.3 percent THC as an “agricultural crop.” This legislation also establishes licensing procedures to allow local farmers to grow hemp commercially. An amendment to the bill requests the federal government to issue a “waiver that will allow this act to be effective without federal preemption.”

New Mexico

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2007
Summary: House Memorial 49 requests the New Mexico State University Board of Regents to study the viability of industrial hemp farming in the state, and urges Congress “to recognize industrial hemp as a valuable agricultural commodity, to define industrial hemp in federal law as a non-psychoactive and genetically identifiable species of the genus Cannabis, and acknowledge that allowing and encouraging farmers to produce industrial hemp will improve the balance of trade by promoting domestic sources of industrial hemp and can make a positive contribution to the issues of global climate change and carbon sequestration.”

North Carolina

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 2006
Summary: The North Carolina Legislature approved the Beneficial Uses of  Industrial Hemp Act which creates a commission to study the “economic opportunities industrial hemp provides to the state and to consider the desirability and feasability of authorizing industrial hemp cultivation and production as a farm product in North Carolina.” The commission will report its findings and recommendations to the 2007 General Assembly and the Environmental Review Commission by December 1, 2006.

North Dakota

Laws Authorizing Commercial Hemp Cultivation

Year Passed: 1999
Summary: The North Dakota Legislature approved House Bill 1428 recognizing industrial hemp having no more than 0.3 percent THC as an “oilseed.” This legislation also establishes licensing procedures to allow local farmers to grow hemp commercially. Applicants must complete a criminal history check, and any person with a prior criminal conviction is not eligible for licensure. (See North Dakota Hemp Research Law.)

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1997
Summary: The North Dakota Legislature approved House Bill 1305 “to provide for a study of industrial hemp production by the [state] agricultural experimental station.” The state study was completed in July 1998.

Oregon

Laws Authorizing Commercial Hemp Cultivation

Year Passed: 2009
Summary: The Oregon Legislature approved Senate Bill 676 which “Permits production and possession of industrial hemp and trade in industrial hemp commodities and products.”

Vermont

Laws Authorizing Commercial Hemp Cultivation

Year Passed: 2008
Summary: The Vermont Legislature approved House Bill 267 which “establish[es] policy and procedures for growing industrial hemp in Vermont so that farmers and other businesses in the Vermont agricultural industry can take advantage of this market opportunity.”  However, farmers will not be able to legally grow hemp under the law until “such time as the United States Congress amends the definition of “marihuana” for the purposes of the Controlled Substances Act.”

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1996
Summary: The Vermont Legislature approved House Bill 783 authorizing “the commissioner of agriculture, food and markets, and the University of Vermont [to] undertake research …of industrial hemp production in the state.” The state study was completed in January 1997.

Virginia

Laws and Resolutions Authorizing Hemp Research

Year Passed: 1999
Summary: The Virginia Legislature approved House Joint Resolution 94 “memorializing the United States Secretary of Agriculture, the Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy to permit the controlled, experimental cultivation of industrial hemp in Virginia.”

West Virginia

Laws Authorizing Commercial Hemp Cultivation

Year Passed: 2002
Summary: The West Virginia Legislature approved Senate Bill 447 recognizing industrial hemp having no more than 1 percent THC as an “agricultural crop.”  This legislation also establishes licensing procedures to allow local farmers to “plant, grow, harvest, possess, process [and] sellhemp commercially.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) today announced rules to clarify the legal status of “hempproducts. “Hemp” is part of the cannabis plant, which is also known as marijuana. The rules published in today’s edition of the Federal Register explain the circumstances under which “hempproducts are subject to control under federal law.

Hemp” and marijuana are actually separate parts of the species of plant known as cannabis. Under federal law, Congress defined marijuana to focus on those parts of the cannabis plant that are the source of tetrahydrocannabinols (THC). THC is the hallucinogenic substance in marijuana that causes the psychoactive effect or “high.” The marijuana portions of the cannabis plant include the flowering tops (buds), the leaves, and the resin of the cannabis plant. The remainder of the plantstalks and sterilized seeds — is what some people refer to as “hemp.” However, “hemp” is not a term that is found in federal law.

DEA Administrator Asa Hutchinson stated that “many Americans do not know that hemp and marijuana are both parts of the same plant and that hemp cannot be produced without producing marijuana.”

While most of the THC in cannabis plants is concentrated in the marijuana, all parts of the plant, including hemp, have been found to contain THC. The existence of THC in hemp is significant because THC, like marijuana, is a schedule I controlled substance. Federal law prohibits human consumption and possession of schedule I controlled substances. In addition, they are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for medical use.

The rules that DEA is publishing today explain which hemp products are legal and which are not. This will depend on whether the product causes THC to enter the human body. If the product does cause THC to enter the human body, it is an illegal substance that may not be manufactured, sold, or consumed in the United States. Such products include “hempfoods and beverages that contain THC.

If, however, the product does not cause THC to enter the human body, it is a noncontrolled substance that may lawfully be sold in the United States. Included in the category of lawful hemp products are textiles, such as clothing made using fiber produced from cannabis plant stalks. Also in the lawful category are personal care products that contain oil from sterilized cannabis seeds, such as soaps, lotions, and shampoos.

In recognition of the fact that there may be a small number of manufacturers and retailers who have inventories of hemp food and beverage products or other products containing THC that are intended for human consumption, DEA is providing a grace period. As set forth in the rules, any person who currently possesses illegal THC-containing “hemp” products will have 120 days (until February 6, 2002) to dispose of such products or remove them from the United States. However, during this grace period, no person may manufacture or distribute any such product for human consumption within the United States.

In issuing these rules, DEA has attempted to strike a fair balance between protecting the health and safety of all Americans and accommodating legitimate industry. The public has 60 days to comment on the rules in the manner set forth in the Federal Register. The rules can be accessed through the web site of the National Archives and Records Administration at www.archives.gov.

Click here for access to The Federal Register:

www.archives.gov

Click here for a full TEXT ONLY version of the hemp rules as they now appear in the Federal Register:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_register&docid=01-25024-filed

Click here for a full PDF version of the hemp rules as they now appear in the Federal Register:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_register&docid=01-25024-filed.pdf

Pursuant to § 811(g)(3)(B), the

Administrator of DEA may exempt from

control ‘‘[a] compound, mixture, or

preparation which contains any

controlled substance, which is not for

administration to a human being or

animal, and which is packaged in such

form or concentration, or with

adulterants or denaturants, so that as

packaged it does not present any

significant potential for abuse.’’

Hemp for Victory 1942 U.S. WWII Propaganda Film and State by State Industrial Hemp Laws

Cannabis Documentaries Cannabinoid Facts Marijuana Peer Reviewed Research Links

Have you ever found it hard to find cannabis documentaries cannabinoids facts or peer reviewed research to share with friends, family members, or associates? Well, look no further! Montana Biotech has been compiling the resources for you, the patient, provider, individual, or researcher. Feel free to share these links as you feel fit. You took the time to find  these cannabis documentaries, cannabinoid facts, and marijuana peer reviewed research links here, no need to look further. As new content is found and shared, Montana Biotech will find the time to  share.

Cannabis TV Documentaries

Weed Wars on the Discovery Channel Episode 4 Season 1

Weed Wars on the Discovery Channel Episode 3 Season 1

Weed Wars on the Discovery Channel Episode 2 Season 1

Weed Wars on the Discovery Channel Episode 1 Season 1

Prohibition a Ken Burns Documentary on PBS

PBS FRONTLINE The Pot Republic

Montana PBS Special Clearing the Smoke: The Science of Cannabis

Hemp for Victory

Reefer Madness

“She Shoulda Said ‘No’!” (also known as Wild Weed)

Marijuana ( Marihuana ) The Devil’s Weed Cannabis Propaganda film (1936)

Marihuana The Assassin of Youth 1935 Anti-Marijuana Propaganda Film

The BEST Cannabis / Marijuana Propaganda Films / Movies of ALL TIME!

Marijuana: A Chronic History Presented by the History Channel

NGC’s Drugs Inc.: Marijuana

NGC’s Marijuana Nation

PBS’ Botany of Desire

CNBC’s Marijuana Inc.

TEA Party Eat your Heart Out!! The Bundy’s Were Here 1st!!

Links:

Find The Best Medical Marijuana in Montana Potency Tested

Exploring the Endocannabinoid System Cannabinoids and their Therapeutic Potentials

Peer Reviewed Research

Hemp for Victory, 1942 U.S. WWII Propoganda Film, and State by State Industrial Hemp Laws

MMJ Clinics / Doctors Recommendations

MMJ Dispensaries/Caregivers: Find Them Here

MMJ Strains / Varieties: Find Them Here Potency Tested

Ed Rosenthal Runs For President in 2012? Stephen’s Colbert SuperPac Funding?

Fastest way to determine cannabis seedling sex!

Grow Buddy Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD test kit

Grow Buddy Instructional Video

Grow Buddy Replacement T.L.C. Supplies

Plant DNA Collection Kit

Montana Biotech Products and Services

Cannabinoid Facts

Specialist Want Regulations / Oversight of Medical Marijuana Analysis Labs, Montana Biotech Embraces Open Dialog

Cannalytics™ Cannabinoid Fingerprinting Test by Alpha Nova vs Grow Buddy™ at Home THC, CBD, CBN Test Kit by Montana Biotech Comparing Two Competing Thin Layer Chromatography T.L.C Methods

QUALTITATIVE vs. QAUNTITATIVE Analysis of Cannabis THC, CBD, CBN Cannabinoid Levels

Ed Rosenthal and the Party-Party’s Platform for America 2012!

A Little Ed History and Education! Wiki Style!

Peer Reviewed Research:

ADD /ADHD, Medical Marijuana and its potential Treatment.

Addiction Risk-Physical of using Medical Marijuana.

Alcoholism and Medical Marijuana.

ALS, Lou Gehrig’s Disease Medical Cannabis Therapy

Cannabis Marijuana Use and AMOTIVATIONAL SYNDROME

Alzheimer’s Disease Progression Prevention Cannabinoids

Medical Cannabis Marijuana and ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES of Cannabinoids

ANTI-BACTERIAL PROPERTIES of Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol,  Cannabichromene, Cannabigerol, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabinol

Medical Cannabis Marijuana and ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES of Cannabinoids

Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol CBD,  Cannabichromene CBC, Cannabigerol CBG, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol THC, Cannabinol CBN and Cannabis Marijuana Antioxidant Properties

Cannabis Marijuana and ANXIOLYTIC, Also Known as Antipanic or Antianxiety Agents, EFFECTS of CBD Cannabidiol for Treatment of Anxiety

APPETITE STIMULANT Medical Marijuana Cannabis and It’s Effects on Hunger the Munchies

ARTHRITIS Cannabis Marijuana and the Effects of Cannabinoids for Treatment

ASTHMA Medical Cannabis /  Marijuana and Cannabinoids Therapeutic Effects on Bronchodilation

Cannabinoinds Therapeutic Effects on ATHEROSCLEROSIS, Medical Cannabis Marijuana Research Cannabidiol THC

Autism the Use of Medical Cannabis Marijuana Derived Cannabinoids for Treatment of Disorder

Bipolar Disorder Mood Stabilizing Effects of Medical Cannabis Derived Cannabinoids THC, CBD Treatments and Therapeutic Potential of Marijuana

BRAIN INJURIES and the NEUROPROTECTANT Properties and Therapeutic Effects of Medical Cannabis Marijuana Cannabinoids Tetrahydrocannabinol THC and Cannabidiol CBD

Breast Cancer Antitumor Effects Inhibition of Cancer Cell Proliferation and Treatment Using Medical Cannabis Marijuana Derived Cannabinoids Tetrahydrocannabinol  Cannabidiol  Cannabigerol Cannabichromene Cannabidiol Acid and THC Acid

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS (card holders)!!!

Contact us to be YOUR Provider/Marijuana Infused Products Provider (MIPP)

Call: 406-600-6871

Call Montana Biotech today for more information on setting up a Grow Room, Help or consultation!

Cell: 406-600-6871

E-Mail: MontanaBiotech@gmail.com

Twitter: @MontanaBiotech

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/joseph.lacerenza

Donate to Cannabis Research at Montana Biotech

T.L.C a Method to Keep Labs in Check, Grow Buddy™ an at Home Medical Marijuana Cannabinoid Analysis Kit

 

 

 

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS!!!

If you have a qualifying medical condition, but cant afford the cost of MMJ registration, we may be able to help.

Wholesale prices are available for all of our products including a 90 day buy back guarantee. Please  feel free to contact us 24/7 with any questions.

Cell: 406-600-6871

TLC, UNODC (United Nations Office on Drug and Crime)

TLC was the method of choice for this study as it provides a means of rapidly and visually analysing a number of samples simultaneously. Unlike the comparison of two samples in order to assess whether they are the same (or different), when quantitative analysis is essential, assessment of origin is qualitative, since the sample under study and the reference samples are, in fact, different. There is thus little point in using more powerful techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography as the quantitative information provided is likely to confuse the picture. The TLC system was designed to give information on the cannabivarins in addition to the more commonly studied cannabinoids. The principal cannabinoids observed using this system are given in table 2. Sample preparation and detection were as previously described [ 47] [ 48] . The solvent system used was a mixture of chloroform (ethanol-free) and l,l-dichloroethane (15:10) with simple ascending TLC on 10 x 20 cm silica gel pre-coated plates with a layer thickness of 0.25 mm (E. Merck, Darmstadt, G.F.R., Art. No. 5729) [ 46] . Each extract was analysed within one hour of preparation. Twenty different samples of herbal cannabis and cannabis resin from several different countries were subjected to hot-solvent extraction to simulate the illicit preparation of liquid cannabis. The resulting chromatograms were compared with those of the starting material.

Grow Buddy™ created by Montana Biotech

Montana Biotech is proud to introduce an at home THC testing kit to the cannabis consuming public. Grow Buddy™ is a THC testing kit a person could use at home to analyze their own medical marijuana for the comparative presence of cannabinoids! Cannabis is a plant that has been used for thousands of years for its medicinal properties. Now you can test for those cannabinoids at home!

Grow Buddy™ is designed to give maximum results with the minimum of effort. The Grow Buddy™ system is a comparative test made to facilitate the grower, patient, caregiver, or connoisseur to be able to test for cannabinoids at home! Grow Buddy™ was created around a T.L.C. method to help ensure ease of use for ALL ability levels.

The control in this test was ~17% THC by volume… You can tell the size of the dots for Connie Chung (A) and (B) are larger. You can draw you own conclusions!

Connie Chung (A) THC Levels

Connie Chung (B) THC Levels


If you are a patient, you now how hard it is to nail down exactly what strains are best for what, or how to even find the information you need to make those educated decisions. Find a variety/strain YOU like for YOUR condition, test it at home, if it is not already tested, and know what to look for in YOUR medication. Green Crack means very little to a patient who has not used cannabis in their adult lives, but Grow Buddy™ can help that patient know why they like Green Crack for what ails them.

Find/discover varieties or strains that have novel combinations of cannabinoids! Compare relative levels of THC, CBD, CBN, CBC in varieties or strains you know and trust!

Grow Buddy™ will provide an individual the opportunity to select amongst their strains “THE ONE” best suited for further analytical testing by a lab you know and trust. Keep the accuracy of the ever increasing number of potency analysis labs in check! Have an idea of what you have before you spend the TIME and MONEY to get it tested in a lab.

Grow Buddy™ is backed by a potency testing lab with experience in the field of cannabis quality testing. Montana Biotech’s Grow Buddy™ is intended for anyone ready to take their medicine to the next level!

The Grow Buddy™ at home THC testing kit is just $100.00 plus $3.50 for shipping and handling. Order yours today!

Links:

Fastest way to determine cannabis seedling sex!

Cannabinoid Facts

Grow Buddy™ T.L.C. test kit

Specialist Want Regulations / Oversight of Medical Marijuana Analysis Labs, Montana Biotech Embraces Open Dialog

Cannabis Cannabinoid Analytics at Home T.L.C. Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD, CBN Medical Marijuana Cannabinoid Fingerprint Test Kit by Montana Biotech

Cannalytics™ Cannabinoid Fingerprinting Test by Alpha Nova vs Grow Buddy™ at Home THC, CBD, CBN Test Kit by Montana Biotech Comparing Two Competing Thin Layer Chromatography T.L.C Methods

Grow Buddy Replacement Thin Layer Chromatography TLC Parts, Pieces, and Accessories, from Montana Biotech

QUALTITATIVE vs. QAUNTITATIVE Analysis of Cannabis THC, CBD, CBN Cannabinoid Levels

Call Montana Biotech today for more information on setting up a Grow Room Help or consultation!

 Cell: 406-600-6871

E-Mail: MontanaBiotech@gmail.com

Twitter: @MontanaBiotech

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/joseph.lacerenza

Donate to Cannabis Research at Montana Biotech


Medical Pot’s Potency Difficult to Quantify for Colorado Dispensaries Specialist Want Regulations / Oversight of Medical Marijuana Analysis Labs, Montana Biotech Embraces Open Dialog

Denver Post

By John Ingold
The Denver Post

Posted: 04/18/2011 01:00:00 AM MDT

Updated: 04/18/2011 11:12:41 AM MDT

When the results came back from the lab, Ean Seeb, an owner of the medicalmarijuana dispensary Denver Relief, had every reason to be thrilled.

One of the store’s most prized marijuana strains had tested at 29 percent THC — the psychoactive component of marijuana — a result that seemed to confirm the strain’s formidable punch.

But, for Seeb, the number also seemed to confirm another hunch: There’s something screwy with medical-marijuana potency testing in Colorado.

“We have one of the highest tests ever that was performed at one of these labs,” Seeb said, “and we don’t believe it.”

That’s because, a year earlier, the same lab had tested a sample of the strain — from a different plant but grown using the same methods — at a more pedestrian 15 percent THC. And tests of the strain at other medicalmarijuana testing labs in the state produced results across the map.

In dispensaries around Colorado, questions have emerged about the value of the measurements the labs producemeasurements that have been hailed as key to bringing scientific precision to medical marijuana.

No one — including Seeb — is abandoning the goal of a system that provides detailed analysis of a strain’s potency and chemical makeup, which medicalmarijuana advocates say will help patients make better-informed decisions. But dispensary owners and patients have begun to note that the current system is less than perfect.

“We’re not using the same standards from lab to lab,” said Frank Quattrone, the owner of Pure Medical Dispensary in Denver and a supporter of testing.

Different techniques among the state’s four labs account for only part of the variations, said Buckie Minor of Full Spectrum Labs, the state’s first cannabistesting lab. Potency can vary within marijuana crops, individual plants and even between subsections of the buds.

What shouldn’t change, Minor said, is the ratio of the different chemicals in the plant, which Minor said is most important for patients picking strains.

“When people get different potency values, they start to think our testing methods are off,” he said.

The debate comes as state lawmakers are poised to give legitimacy to medicalmarijuana testing labs. A provision in House Bill 1043, which adjusts several medicalmarijuana laws, gives explicit permission for dispensaries to provide samples to labs for testing.

“We’re actually creating a research and development piece that’s the first of any state,” Rep. Tom Massey, the Poncha Springs Republican who is sponsoring the bill, said during a debate last week.

The subject is likely to get more attention this week, when the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, or NORML, holds its annual conference in Denver. Among the panels scheduled for the conference is one titled, “Medical marijuana: It’s not just THC.”

That panel features a representative from a testing lab in California, where a handful of labs recently announced the formation of a trade group to create standardized practices.

“The testing methodology should all be the same,” said Robert Martin, a founder of the Association of California Cannabis Laboratories. “. . . People will lose faith in the industry if they can’t depend on the results.”

Seeb said he would like to see a similar association started here. Until then, he said, he will continue to harbor suspicions about the test results, no matter how impressive they are.

“We recognize the importance of (testing) and we want it,” he said. “It just isn’t there yet.”

John Ingold: 303-954-1068 or jingold@denverpost.com
Read more: Medical pot’s potency difficult to pin down for Colorado dispensaries – The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/news/marijuana/ci_17870142#ixzz1JzDxOJbp
Read The Denver Post’s Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS!!!

If you have a qualifying medical condition, but cant afford the cost of MMJ registration, we may be able to help.

Wholesale prices are available for all of our products including a 90 day buy back guarantee. Please  feel free to contact us 24/7 with any questions.

Cell: 406-600-6871

This is as good a place as any to mention the Grow Buddy™ at home cannabinoid testing kit! Take a sample from one lab 34% THC bud, run it against the same sample of bud tested at 16% by a different lab! If YOUR analysis does not show a significant difference between the two, you can draw your own conclusions!!

TLC, UNODC (United Nations Office of Drug  and Crime)

TLC was the method of choice for this study as it provides a means of rapidly and visually analysing a number of samples simultaneously. Unlike the comparison of two samples in order to assess whether they are the same (or different), when quantitative analysis is essential, assessment of origin is qualitative, since the sample under study and the reference samples are, in fact, different. There is thus little point in using more powerful techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography as the quantitative information provided is likely to confuse the picture. The TLC system was designed to give information on the cannabivarins in addition to the more commonly studied cannabinoids. The principal cannabinoids observed using this system are given in table 2. Sample preparation and detection were as previously described [ 47] [ 48] . The solvent system used was a mixture of chloroform (ethanol-free) and l,l-dichloroethane (15:10) with simple ascending TLC on 10 x 20 cm silica gel pre-coated plates with a layer thickness of 0.25 mm (E. Merck, Darmstadt, G.F.R., Art. No. 5729) [ 46] . Each extract was analysed within one hour of preparation. Twenty different samples of herbal cannabis and cannabis resin from several different countries were subjected to hot-solvent extraction to simulate the illicit preparation of liquid cannabis. The resulting chromatograms were compared with those of the starting material.

Ed Rosenthal, Joseph Lacerenza Owner/Lead Researcher Montana Biotech at the Garden City Cannabis Expo

So, I had been blogging for a little there about wanting to meet Ed Rosenthal!!! Well, all seemed primed for an outragouse meeting. I had the mobile lab ready, and was gearing up to debut the Grow Buddy™  an at Home Cannabinoid Profiling Kit and the Plant DNA Collection Kit™. The Thursday and Friday before the Expo, saw a significant amount of snow in the Gallatin valley. My associate and I decided I should take the Greyhound…. That trip is a whole other story. The mobile lab was not going to be there in Missoula, but I did still have the Grow Buddy™ and the Plant DNA Collection Kit™.

So I show up to the Garden City Cannabis Expo Saturday morning, and set up. All was going as expected, I talked to Casidy of Growing Green on Mcat.org Channel 7 Fridays 5:30Pm-6:30PM. Rose Habib of Cannabanalysis stopped by for a talk. A group had gathered to hear about the Grow Buddy™ and how it can be used in many different ways to gain a better understanding of what is in your cannabis at home. I am doing my pitch as Ed approached. He listened politely and left.

I chose the first winner of a Grow Buddy™ at the expo, Michael Parrott, cleaned-up and left for the night, Sunday would be a new day. It was a new day, indeed!!! The day started as usual people stopping by asking questions, yah know the usual. Sen. David Wanzenreid, D-Missoula came to address the Expo. All was good… I had people come by the exhibit. Then, as if Moses parted the Red sea himself, Ed crosses the room and makes directly fro my exhibit. There was no one at my both this time, no buffer, no retreat. This was it, this was ME meeting ED Rosenthal!

He grabbed a Grow Buddy™ and asked, “How much?” I look Ed in the eye and said to him, “I know who you are…”, “I can’t SELL this to you, your Ed Rosenthal“. He says, “How much?” I say, “It would be the first one I have sold, $50…” “Great!”, he says and hands me a 50 dollar bill and walks away!!! I was beside myself. I kind of felt I blew it!! I felt like Ed just may have thought I was a joke!!!

Wayne of King Medicine, he had a booth near mine, says, “Did you get a picture with him…?” “He is kind of a legend, when’s the next time you’ll get to meet him?” That is how the picture was taken. There is some history behind Ed and Joe! Oh, yah, the second winner of a Grow Buddy™ was Sam Sisk, but I know you don’t care because you did not win!!!

Danny Danko, HIGH TIMES Presents: Medical Marijuana Grow Clinic, Missoula Montana May 1st

Sunday, May 1, 2011 from 10:00 AM – 5:00 PM (MT)
Holiday Inn Missoula Downtown at the Park – Missoula, MT

hash making, medical marijuana, montana, how to, grow

For over 35 years, HIGH TIMES has taught the world how to grow – and now this is your chance to learn in person from
HIGH TIMES cultivation experts Danny Danko and Nico Escondido.

WHEN: Sunday, May 1, 2011 from 10:00 AM – 5:00 PM (MT)

WHERE: Holiday Inn Missoula Downtown at the Park – 200 South Pattee Missoula, MT 59802

DANNY DANKO:

Danny Danko is a writer, photographer and Senior Cultivation Editor of HIGH TIMES Magazine.

He has written numerous articles on the subject of marijuana gardening both outdoor and indoor. Danko is the writer of Top Ten Strains of the Year every year since 2005 and also the creator and founder of the HIGH TIMES Seed Bank Hall of Fame.

NICO ESCONDIDO:

Nico Escondido is the Cultivation Editor for HIGH TIMES and has been writing and photographing for the magazine for the past five years.

Experimenting in lands as far off as Australia as well as close-to-home nations such as Mexico and Canada, Nico has managed grow operations in a variety of countries, climates and settings around the globe. Nico’s biggest focus these days is on improving the current technological trends of cultivation for everyone from the beginner gardener to the most advanced grower. Science and freedom are the two elements most often preached by Mr. Escondido and he is very adamant about both.

Topics will include:

* Beginner indoor and hydro growing

* Getting the most out of your plants

* Choosing medicinal strains

* Cultivating and medicating legally

* Equipment: Lighting, Ventilation, Mediums, etc.

* Seeds vs. Clones

* Determining Plant Sex

* The Perpetual Harvest

* The Flowering Stage

* Nutrients: NPK and more

* Pest Awareness and Control

* Harvesting

* Hashmaking 101

* Q & A

And more!

***Seating for this event is extremely limited and tickets may only be purchased online in advance***


SB 423 UPDATE 4-26-2011: Bill Passes Both House and Senate…420 UPDATE: Montana SB423, Repeal in Discuise, Vote in House and Senate Today, VETO Gov. Schweitzr, Please!

UPDATE Judge’s Ruling on SB-423 Injunction June 30, 2011 PDF UPDATE

UPDATE 4-26-2011: SB 423 Passes both the House and Senate, Bill headed to Governor Schweitzer’s Desk

Vote Break down by House and Senate:

MONTANA HOUSE
62nd Legislative Session
2011 Regular Session
VOTE TABULATION

MONTANA SENATE
62nd Legislative Session
2011 Regular Session
VOTE TABULATION

Ask Schweitzer to VETO this BILL!!!

governor@mt.gov

UPDATE 4-21-2011: SB423 as it reads:

http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2011/billhtml/SB0423.htm

2011 Montana Legislature

Additional Bill Links     PDF (with line numbers)

SENATE BILL NO. 423

INTRODUCED BY J. ESSMANN

BY REQUEST OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE

A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: “AN ACT ESTABLISHING THE MONTANA THERAPEUTIC MARIJUANA ACT AND REVISING LAWS RELATING TO THE USE OF MARIJUANA; CREATING A SYSTEM OF LICENSING REGISTRY PROGRAM FOR THE CULTIVATION, MANUFACTURE, TRANSPORTATION, AND TRANSFER OF MARIJUANA FOR THERAPEUTIC USE BY CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING RULEMAKING AUTHORITY; CREATING A SPECIAL REVENUE ACCOUNT; ESTABLISHING A TRANSITION PROCESS; AMENDING SECTIONS 37-1-101, 37-1-136, 37-1-316, 37-3-343, 37-3-347, 41-5-216, 45-9-101, 45-9-102, 45-9-103, 45-9-110, 45-9-127, 45-9-203, 45-10-103, 45-10-107, 50-46-201, 50-46-202, 45-9-203, AND 61-11-101, 69-1-114, AND 69-1-401, MCA; REPEALING SECTIONS 50-46-101, 50-46-102, 50-46-103, 50-46-201, 50-46-202, 50-46-205, 50-46-206, 50-46-207, AND 50-46-210, MCA; AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATES.”

WHEREAS, THE STATE OF MONTANA UNDERSTANDS THAT MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTING, OR DISPENSING A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OR POSSESSING A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTE, OR DISPENSE THE SUBSTANCE IS A VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT; AND

WHEREAS, MARIJUANA IS LISTED AS A SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE UNDER THAT ACT; AND

WHEREAS, BY ALLOWING THE LIMITED USE OF MARIJUANA UNDER THE MONTANA MARIJUANA ACT, THE STATE OF MONTANA DOES NOT CONDONE THE COMMISSION OF A CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

(Refer to Third Reading — Blue Bill)

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:

NEW SECTION.  Section 1.  Short title — purpose. (1) [Sections 1 through 17] may be cited as the “Montana Marijuana Act”.

(2) The purpose of [sections 1 through 17] is to:

(a) provide legal protections to persons with debilitating medical conditions who engage in the use of marijuana to alleviate the symptoms of the debilitating medical condition;

(b) allow for the limited cultivation, manufacture, delivery, and possession of marijuana as permitted by [sections 1 through 17] by persons who obtain registry identification cards; and

(c) give local governments a role in establishing standards for the cultivation, manufacture, and use of marijuana that protect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents within their jurisdictions.

NEW SECTION.  Section 2.  Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 17], the following definitions apply:

(1) “Debilitating medical condition” means a medical condition determined by a physician to be debilitating for the person diagnosed with the condition.

(2) “Department” means the department of public health and human services provided for in 2-15-2201.

(3) “Local government” means a county, a consolidated government, or an incorporated city or town.

(4) “Marijuana” has the meaning provided in 50-32-101.

(5) “Mature marijuana plant” means a harvestable female marijuana plant that is flowering.

(6) “Paraphernalia” has the meaning provided in 45-10-101.

(7) “Physician” means a person who is licensed under Title 37, chapter 3, and has an established office located in Montana.

(8) (a) “Provider” means a Montana resident 18 years of age or older who is authorized by the department to cultivate, manufacture, possess, or transport marijuana for use by a registered cardholder.

(b) The term does not include the cardholder’s physician.

(9) “Registered cardholder” or “cardholder” means a Montana resident with a debilitating medical condition who has received and maintains a valid registry identification card.

(10) “Registry identification card” means a document issued by the department pursuant to [section 3] that identifies a person as a registered cardholder or provider.

(11) (a) “Resident” means an individual who meets the requirements of 1-1-215.

(b) An individual is not considered a resident for the purposes of [sections 1 through 17] if the individual:

(i) claims residence in another state or country for any purpose; or

(ii) is an absentee property owner paying property tax on property in Montana.

(12) “Seedling” means a marijuana plant that has no flowers and is less than 12 inches in height and 12 inches in diameter.

(13) “Standard of care” means the standard established by rule by the board of medical examiners.

(14) (a) “Usable marijuana” means the dried leaves and flowers of the marijuana plant and any mixtures or preparations of the dried leaves and flowers that are appropriate for the use of marijuana by a person with a debilitating medical condition.

(b) The term does not include the seeds, stalks, and roots of the plant.

(15) “Written certification” means a statement signed by a treating physician that meets the requirements of [section 6] and is provided in a manner that meets the standard of care.

NEW SECTION.  Section 3. Department responsibilities — issuance of cards — confidentiality — reports. (1) (a) The department shall establish and maintain a program for the issuance of registry identification cards to Montana residents who:

(i) have debilitating medical conditions and who submit applications meeting the requirements of [sections 1 through 17]; and

(ii) are named as providers by persons who obtain registry identification cards for their debilitating medical conditions.

(b) Persons who obtain registry identification cards are authorized to cultivate, manufacture, possess, and transport marijuana as allowed by [sections 1 through 17].

(2) The department shall conduct criminal history background checks as required by [sections 4 and 5] before issuing a registry identification card for a person named as a provider.

(3) Registry identification cards issued pursuant to [sections 1 through 17] must:

(a) be laminated and produced on a material capable of lasting for the duration of the time period for which the card is valid;

(b) state the name, address, and date of birth of the registered cardholder and of the cardholder’s provider, if any;

(c) state the date of issuance and the expiration date of the registry identification card;

(d) contain a unique identification number;

(e) easily identify whether the card is for a person with a debilitating medical condition or for a provider; and

(f) contain other information that the department may specify by rule.

(4) (a) The department shall verify the information contained in an application or renewal submitted pursuant to [sections 1 through 17] and shall approve or deny an application or renewal within 15 days of receiving the application or renewal and all related application materials.

(b) The department shall issue a registry identification card within 15 days of approving an application or renewal.

(5) Registry identification cards expire 1 year after the date of issuance unless a registered cardholder changes providers. A provider’s registry identification card expires at the time the department issues a card to a new provider named by a registered cardholder.

(6) A registered cardholder shall notify the department of any change in the cardholder’s name, address, physician, or provider or change in the status of the cardholder’s debilitating medical condition within 10 days of the change. If a change occurs and is not reported to the department, the registry identification card is void.

(7) The department shall maintain a confidential list of persons to whom the department has issued registry identification cards. Except as provided in subsection (8), individual names and other identifying information on the list must be confidential and are not subject to disclosure, except to:

(a) authorized employees of the department as necessary to perform the official duties of the department; and

(b) authorized employees of state or local government agencies, including law enforcement agencies, only as necessary to verify that an individual is a lawful possessor of a registry identification card.

(8) The department shall provide the names of registered cardholders and providers to the local law enforcement agency having jurisdiction in the area in which the cardholders or providers live. The law enforcement agency and its employees are subject to the confidentiality requirements of [section 14].

(9) (a) The department shall provide the board of medical examiners with the name of any physician who provides written certification for 15 or more patients within a 12-month period. The board of medical examiners shall review the physician’s practices in order to determine whether the practices meet the standard of care.

(b) The physician whose practices are under review shall pay the costs of the board’s review activities.

(10) The department shall report biannually to the legislature the number of applications for registry identification cards, the number of registered cardholders approved, the nature of the debilitating medical conditions of the cardholders, the number of providers approved, the number of registry identification cards revoked, the number of physicians providing written certification for registered cardholders, and the number of written certifications each physician has provided. The report may not provide any identifying information of cardholders or physicians.

NEW SECTION.  Section 4.  Persons with debilitating medical conditions — requirements — minors — limitations. (1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3), the department shall issue a registry identification card to a person with a debilitating medical condition who submits the following, in accordance with department rules:

(a) an application on a form prescribed by the department;

(b) an application fee or a renewal fee;

(c) the person’s name, street address, and date of birth;

(d) proof of Montana residency;

(e) a statement that the person will be cultivating and manufacturing marijuana for the person’s use or will be obtaining marijuana from a provider;

(f) the name of the person’s treating physician and the street address and telephone number of the physician’s office;

(g) the street address where the person is cultivating or manufacturing marijuana if the person is cultivating or manufacturing marijuana for the person’s own use;

(h) the name, date of birth, and street address of the individual the person has selected as a provider, if any; and

(i) a statement from the person’s treating physician as required pursuant to [section 6].

(2) The department shall issue a registry identification card to a minor if the materials required under subsection (2) are submitted and the minor’s custodial parent or legal guardian with responsibility for health care decisions signs and submits a written statement that:

(a) the minor’s physician has explained to the minor and to the minor’s custodial parent or legal guardian with responsibility for health care decisions the potential risks and benefits of the use of marijuana; and

(b) the minor’s custodial parent or legal guardian with responsibility for health care decisions:

(i) consents to the use of marijuana by the minor;

(ii) agrees to serve as the minor’s provider;

(iii) agrees to control the acquisition of marijuana and the dosage and frequency of the use of marijuana by the minor; and

(iv) undergoes a name-based background check. The parent or legal guardian shall pay the costs of the background check.

(3) A person may not be a registered cardholder if the person is in the custody of or under the supervision of the department of corrections or, a youth court, A DISTRICT COURT, OR A COURT OF LIMITED JURISDICTION OR IS ORDERED BY A COURT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CRIMINAL SUPERVISION OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM.

(4) A registered cardholder who elects to obtain marijuana from a provider may not cultivate or manufacture marijuana for the cardholder’s use.

(5) A registered cardholder may cultivate or manufacture marijuana as allowed under [section 9] only:

(a) at a property that is owned by the cardholder; or

(b) with written permission of the landlord, at a property that is rented or leased by the cardholder.

(6) No portion of the property used for cultivation and manufacture of marijuana for use by the registered cardholder may be shared with or rented or leased to a provider or to a registered cardholder unless the property is owned, rented, or leased by cardholders who are related to each other by the second degree of kinship by blood or marriage.

NEW SECTION.  Section 5.  Providers — requirements — limitations. (1) The department shall issue a registry identification card to the person who is named as a provider in a registered cardholder’s approved application if the person submits to the department:

(a) the person’s name, date of birth, and street address on a form prescribed by the department;

(b) proof that the person is a Montana resident;

(c) fingerprints to facilitate a fingerprint and background check by the department of justice and the federal bureau of investigation;

(d) a written agreement signed by the registered cardholder;

(e) a statement indicating whether the person will cultivate and manufacture marijuana for the registered cardholder at a property owned, rented, or leased by the cardholder or by the person; and

(f) a fee as determined by the department to cover the costs of the fingerprint and background check and associated administrative costs of processing the registration.

(2) The department may not register a person as a provider if the person:

(a) has a felony conviction or a conviction for a drug offense;

(b) is in the custody of or under the supervision of the department of corrections or a youth court, A DISTRICT COURT, OR A COURT OF LIMITED JURISDICTION OR IS ORDERED BY A COURT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CRIMINAL SUPERVISION OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM;

(c) has failed to:

(i) pay any taxes, interest, penalties, or judgments due to a government agency;

(ii) stay out of default on a government-issued student loan;

(iii) pay child support; or

(iv) remedy an outstanding delinquency for child support or for taxes or judgments owed to a government agency.

(3) A provider may assist only one registered cardholder unless the provider is simultaneously caring for up to three cardholders and two of the cardholders are related to the provider by the second degree of kinship by blood or marriage.

(4) Marijuana for use pursuant to [sections 1 through 17] must be cultivated and manufactured in Montana.

(5) A provider may not:

(a) accept compensation for any services or products provided to a registered cardholder;

(b) use marijuana; or

(c) be a registered cardholder.

(6) (a) A provider may cultivate and manufacture marijuana for use by a registered cardholder only at:

(i) a property that is owned by the provider;

(ii) with written permission of the landlord, a property that is rented or leased by the provider; or

(iii) a property owned, leased, or rented by the registered cardholder pursuant to the provisions of [section 4].

(b) No portion of the property used for cultivation and manufacture of marijuana may be shared with or rented or leased to another provider or another registered cardholder.

NEW SECTION.  Section 6.  Physician statement. (1) The written certification provided by a physician must:

(a) confirm that the physician is the person’s treating physician and that the person has been under the physician’s medical care and supervision;

(b) confirm that the person suffers from a debilitating medical condition;

(c) describe the debilitating medical condition, why the condition is debilitating, and the extent to which it is debilitating;

(d) describe the medications, procedures, and other medical options used to treat the condition;

(e) state that the medications, procedures, or other medical options have not been effective;

(f) state that the physician has a reasonable degree of certainty that the person’s debilitating medical condition would be alleviated by the use of marijuana and that, as a result, the patient would be likely to benefit from the use of marijuana;

(g) list restrictions on the person’s activities due to the use of marijuana;

(h) specify the time period for which the use of marijuana would be appropriate, up to a maximum of 1 year; and

(i) state that the physician will:

(i) continue to serve as the person’s treating physician; and

(ii) supervise the person’s use of marijuana and evaluate the efficacy of the treatment.

(2) If the written certification states that marijuana should be used for less than 1 year, the department shall issue a registry identification card that is valid for the period specified in the written certification.

NEW SECTION.  Section 7.  Registry card to be carried and exhibited on demand — photo identification required. A registered cardholder or provider shall keep the cardholder’s or provider’s registry identification card in the person’s immediate possession at all times. The person shall display the registry identification card and a valid photo identification upon demand of a law enforcement officer, justice of the peace, or city or municipal judge.

NEW SECTION.  Section 8.  Health care facility procedures for patients with marijuana for use. (1) Except for hospices that allow the use of marijuana as provided in [section 10], a health care facility as defined in 50-5-101 shall take the following measures in the order listed when a patient who is a registered cardholder has marijuana in the patient’s possession upon admission to the health care facility:

(a) require the patient to remove the marijuana from the premises before the patient is admitted if the patient is able to do so;

(b) make a reasonable effort to contact the patient’s provider, if any; or

(c) contact the local law enforcement agency having jurisdiction in the area where the facility is located.

(2) A provider contacted by a health care facility shall remove the marijuana and deliver it to the patient’s residence.

(3) A law enforcement agency contacted by a health care facility shall respond by removing and destroying the marijuana.

(4) A health care facility may not be charged for costs related to removal of the marijuana from the facility’s premises.

NEW SECTION.  Section 9.  Legal protections — allowable amounts. (1) (a) A registered cardholder may possess up to 4 mature plants, 12 seedlings, and 1 ounce of usable marijuana.

(b) A provider may possess the amounts allowed under subsection (1)(a) for each registered cardholder who has named the person as the registered cardholder’s provider.

(2) Except as provided in [section 10] and subject to the provisions of subsection (7), an individual who possesses a registry identification card issued pursuant to [sections 1 through 17] may not be arrested, prosecuted, or penalized in any manner or be denied any right or privilege, including but not limited to civil penalty or disciplinary action by a professional licensing board or the department of labor and industry, solely because:

(a) the registered cardholder or provider cultivates, manufactures, possesses, or transports marijuana in the amounts allowed under this section; or

(b) the registered cardholder acquires or uses marijuana.

(3) A physician may not be arrested, prosecuted, or penalized in any manner or be denied any right or privilege, including but not limited to civil penalty or disciplinary action by the board of medical examiners or the department of labor and industry, solely for providing written certification for a patient with a debilitating medical condition.

(4) Nothing in this section prevents the imposition of a civil penalty or a disciplinary action by a professional licensing board or the department of labor and industry if:

(a) a registered cardholder’s use of marijuana impairs the cardholder’s job-related performance; or

(b) a physician violates the standard of care or other requirements of [sections 1 through 17].

(5) (a) An individual may not be arrested or prosecuted for constructive possession, conspiracy as provided in 45-4-102, or other provisions of law or any other offense solely for being in the presence or vicinity of the use of marijuana as permitted under [sections 1 through 17].

(b) This subsection (5) does not prevent the arrest or prosecution of an individual who is in the vicinity of a registered cardholder’s use of marijuana if the individual is in possession of or is using marijuana and is not a registered cardholder.

(6) Possession of or application for a registry identification card does not alone constitute probable cause to search the individual or the property of the individual possessing or applying for the registry identification card or otherwise subject the individual or property of the individual possessing or applying for the card to inspection by any governmental agency, including a law enforcement agency.

(7) The provisions of this section relating to protection from arrest or prosecution do not apply to an individual unless the individual has obtained a registry identification card prior to an arrest or the filing of a criminal charge. It is not a defense to a criminal charge that an individual obtains a registry identification card after an arrest or the filing of a criminal charge.

NEW SECTION.  Section 10.  Limitations of the act. (1) [Sections 1 through 17] do not permit:

(a) any person, including a registered cardholder, to operate, navigate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat while under the influence of marijuana; or

(b) except as provided in subsection (3), the use of marijuana by a registered cardholder:

(i) in a health care facility as defined in 50-5-101;

(ii) in a school or a postsecondary school as defined in 20-5-402;

(iii) on or in any property owned by a school district or a postsecondary school;

(iv) on or in any property leased by a school district or a postsecondary school when the property is being used for school-related purposes;

(v) in a school bus or other form of public transportation;

(vi) in a correctional facility, INCLUDING ALL FACILITIES DESCRIBED IN 53-1-203;

(vii) at a public park, public beach, public recreation center, or youth center;

(viii) in or on the property of any church, synagogue, or other place of worship;

(ix) in plain view of or in a place open to the general public; or

(x) where exposure to the marijuana smoke significantly adversely affects the health, safety, or welfare of children; OR

(XI) WHO IS UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A YOUTH COURT OR IS ORDERED BY A COURT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CRIMINAL SUPERVISION OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM.

(2) A registered cardholder or a provider may not cultivate or manufacture marijuana for use by a registered cardholder in a manner that is visible from the street or other public area.

(3) A hospice licensed under Title 50, chapter 5, may adopt a policy that allows use of marijuana by a registered cardholder.

(4) Nothing in [sections 1 through 17] may be construed to require:

(a) a government medical assistance program, a group benefit plan that is covered by the provisions of Title 2, chapter 18, an insurer covered by the provisions of Title 33, or an insurer as defined in 39-71-116 to reimburse a person for costs associated with the use of marijuana by a person with a debilitating medical condition;

(b) an employer to accommodate the use of marijuana by a registered cardholder;

(c) a school or postsecondary school to allow a registered cardholder to participate in extracurricular activities; or

(d) a landlord to allow a tenant who is a registered cardholder or a provider to cultivate or manufacture marijuana or to allow a registered cardholder to use marijuana.

(5) Nothing in [sections 1 through 17] may be construed to:

(a) prohibit an employer from including in any contract a provision prohibiting the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition; or

(b) permit a cause of action against an employer for wrongful discharge pursuant to 39-2-904 or discrimination pursuant to 49-1-102.

(6) Nothing in [sections 1 through 17] may be construed to allow a provider to use marijuana or to prevent criminal prosecution of a provider who uses marijuana or paraphernalia for personal use.

(7) (a) A law enforcement officer who has reasonable cause to believe that a registered cardholder or provider is driving under the influence of marijuana may apply for a search warrant to require the person to provide a sample of the person’s blood for testing pursuant to the provisions of 61-8-405. A person with a tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) level of 3.5 ng/ml may be charged with a violation of 61-8-401.

(b) A registered cardholder or provider who violates subsection (1)(a) is subject to revocation of the person’s registry identification card if the individual is convicted of or pleads guilty to any offense related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs when the initial offense with which the individual was charged was a violation of 61-8-401, 61-8-406, or 61-8-410. A revocation under this section must be for the period of suspension or revocation set forth:

(i) in 61-5-208 for a violation of 61-8-401 or 61-8-406; or

(ii) in 61-8-410 for a violation of 61-8-410.

(c) If a person’s registry identification card is subject to renewal during the revocation period, the person may not renew the card until the full revocation period has elapsed. The card may be renewed only if the person submits all materials required for renewal.

NEW SECTION.  Section 11.  Local government authority to regulate. To protect the public health, safety, or welfare, a local government may by ordinance or resolution regulate a provider that operates within the local government’s jurisdictional area. The regulations may include but are not limited to inspections of locations where marijuana is cultivated or manufactured in order to ensure compliance with any public health, safety, and welfare requirements established by the department or the local government.

NEW SECTION.  Section 12.  Unlawful conduct by cardholders — penalties. (1) The department shall revoke and may not reissue the registry identification card of a person who:

(a) is convicted of a drug offense; or

(b) allows another person to be in possession of the cardholder’s:

(i) registry identification card; or

(ii) marijuana plants or usable marijuana.

(2) A registered cardholder or a provider who violates [sections 1 through 17] is punishable by a fine not to exceed $500 or by imprisonment in a county jail for a term not to exceed 6 months, or both, unless otherwise provided in [sections 1 through 17] or unless the violation would constitute a violation of Title 45. An offense constituting a violation of Title 45 must be charged and prosecuted pursuant to the provisions of Title 45.

NEW SECTION.  Section 13.  Fraudulent representation — penalties. (1) In addition to any other penalties provided by law, a person who fraudulently represents to a law enforcement official that the person is a registered cardholder or a provider is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than 1 year or not more than 5 years or a fine not to exceed $50,000, or both.

(2) A physician who purposely and knowingly misrepresents any information required under [section 6] is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than 1 year or not more than 5 years or a fine not to exceed $50,000, or both.

NEW SECTION.  Section 14.  Confidentiality of registry information — penalty. (1) A person, including an employee or official of the department of public health and human services, commits the offense of disclosure of confidential information related to registry information if the person knowingly or purposely discloses confidential information in violation of [sections 1 through 17].

(2) A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be fined not to exceed $1,000 or imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 6 months, or both.

NEW SECTION.  Section 15.  Law enforcement authority. Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit a law enforcement agency’s ability to investigate unlawful activity in relation to a person with a debilitating medical condition or the person’s provider.

NEW SECTION.  Section 16.  Forfeiture. (1) Marijuana, paraphernalia relating to marijuana, or other property seized by a law enforcement official from a person claiming the protections of [sections 1 through 17] in connection with the cultivation, manufacture, possession, transportation, distribution, or use of marijuana must be returned to the person immediately upon a determination that the person is in compliance with the provisions of [sections 1 through 17].

(2) A law enforcement agency in possession of marijuana plants seized as evidence is not responsible for the care and maintenance of the plants.

NEW SECTION.  Section 17.  Rulemaking authority — fees. (1) The department shall adopt rules necessary for the implementation and administration of [sections 1 through 17]. The rules must include but are not limited to:

(a) the manner in which the department will consider applications for registry identification cards for providers and for persons with debilitating medical conditions and renewal of registry identification cards for providers and registered cardholders;

(b) the acceptable forms of proof of Montana residency;

(c) the procedures for obtaining fingerprints for the fingerprint and background check required under [section 5]; and

(d) other rules necessary to implement the purposes of [sections 1 through 17].

(2) The department’s rules must establish application and renewal fees that generate revenue sufficient to offset all expenses of implementing and administering [sections 1 through 17].

Section 18.  Section 37-1-316, MCA, is amended to read:

“37-1-316.  Unprofessional conduct. The following is unprofessional conduct for a licensee or license applicant governed by this part:

(1)  conviction, including conviction following a plea of nolo contendere, of a crime relating to or committed during the course of the person’s practice or involving violence, use or sale of drugs, fraud, deceit, or theft, whether or not an appeal is pending;

(2)  permitting, aiding, abetting, or conspiring with a person to violate or circumvent a law relating to licensure or certification;

(3)  fraud, misrepresentation, deception, or concealment of a material fact in applying for or assisting in securing a license or license renewal or in taking an examination required for licensure;

(4)  signing or issuing, in the licensee’s professional capacity, a document or statement that the licensee knows or reasonably ought to know contains a false or misleading statement;

(5)  a misleading, deceptive, false, or fraudulent advertisement or other representation in the conduct of the profession or occupation;

(6)  offering, giving, or promising anything of value or benefit to a federal, state, or local government employee or official for the purpose of influencing the employee or official to circumvent a federal, state, or local law, rule, or ordinance governing the licensee’s profession or occupation;

(7)  denial, suspension, revocation, probation, fine, or other license restriction or discipline against a licensee by a state, province, territory, or Indian tribal government or the federal government if the action is not on appeal, under judicial review, or has been satisfied;

(8)  failure to comply with a term, condition, or limitation of a license by final order of a board;

(9)  revealing confidential information obtained as the result of a professional relationship without the prior consent of the recipient of services, except as authorized or required by law;

(10) use of alcohol, a habit-forming drug, or a controlled substance as defined in Title 50, chapter 32, to the extent that the use impairs the user physically or mentally in the performance of licensed professional duties;

(11) having a physical or mental disability that renders the licensee or license applicant unable to practice the profession or occupation with reasonable skill and safety;

(12) engaging in conduct in the course of one’s practice while suffering from a contagious or infectious disease involving serious risk to public health or without taking adequate precautions, including but not limited to informed consent, protective gear, or cessation of practice;

(13) misappropriating property or funds from a client or workplace or failing to comply with a board rule regarding the accounting and distribution of a client’s property or funds;

(14) interference with an investigation or disciplinary proceeding by willful misrepresentation of facts, by the use of threats or harassment against or inducement to a client or witness to prevent them from providing evidence in a disciplinary proceeding or other legal action, or by use of threats or harassment against or inducement to a person to prevent or attempt to prevent a disciplinary proceeding or other legal action from being filed, prosecuted, or completed;

(15) assisting in the unlicensed practice of a profession or occupation or allowing another person or organization to practice or offer to practice by use of the licensee’s license;

(16) failing to report the institution of or final action on a malpractice action, including a final decision on appeal, against the licensee or of an action against the licensee by a:

(a)  peer review committee;

(b)  professional association; or

(c)  local, state, federal, territorial, provincial, or Indian tribal government;

(17) failure of a health care provider, as defined in 27-6-103, to comply with a policy or practice implementing 28-10-103(3)(a);

(18) conduct that does not meet the generally accepted standards of practice. A certified copy of a malpractice judgment against the licensee or license applicant or of a tort judgment in an action involving an act or omission occurring during the scope and course of the practice is conclusive evidence of but is not needed to prove conduct that does not meet generally accepted standards;

(19) the sole use of any electronic means, including teleconferencing, to obtain the information required for the written certification that is used to apply for a registry identification card pursuant to [sections 1 through 17].”

Section 19.  Section 37-3-343, MCA, is amended to read:

“37-3-343.  Practice of telemedicine prohibited without license — scope of practice limitations — violations and penalty. (1) A physician may not practice telemedicine in this state without a telemedicine license issued pursuant to 37-3-301, 37-3-341 through 37-3-345, and 37-3-347 through 37-3-349.

(2)  A telemedicine license authorizes an out-of-state physician to practice telemedicine only with respect to the specialty in which the physician is board-certified or meets the current requirements to take the examination to become board-certified and on which the physician bases the physician’s application for a telemedicine license pursuant to 37-3-345(2).

(3)  A telemedicine license authorizes an out-of-state physician to practice only telemedicine. A telemedicine license does not authorize the physician to engage in the practice of medicine while physically present within the state.

(4) A telemedicine license may not be used by a physician as a means to obtain the information required for the written certification that is used to apply for a registry identification card pursuant to [sections 1 through 17].

(4)(5)  A physician who practices telemedicine in this state without a telemedicine license issued pursuant to 37-3-301, 37-3-341 through 37-3-345, and 37-3-347 through 37-3-349, in violation of the terms or conditions of that license, in violation of the scope of practice allowed by the license, or without a physician’s license issued pursuant to 37-3-301, is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction shall be sentenced as provided in 37-3-325.”

Section 20.  Section 37-3-347, MCA, is amended to read:

“37-3-347.  Reasons for denial of license — alternative route to licensed practice. (1) The board may deny an application for a telemedicine license if the applicant:

(a)  fails to demonstrate that the applicant possesses the qualifications for a license required by 37-3-341 through 37-3-345 and 37-3-347 through 37-3-349 and the rules of the board;

(b) plans to use telemedicine as a means to obtain the information required for the written certification that is used to apply for a registry identification card pursuant to [sections 1 through 17];

(b)(c)  fails to pay a required fee;

(c)(d)  does not possess the qualifications or character required by this chapter; or

(d)(e)  has committed unprofessional conduct.

(2)  A physician who does not meet the qualifications for a telemedicine license provided in 37-3-345 may apply for a physician’s license in order to practice medicine in Montana.”

Section 21.  Section 41-5-216, MCA, is amended to read:

“41-5-216.  Disposition of youth court, law enforcement, and department records — sharing and access to records. (1) Formal youth court records, law enforcement records, and department records that are not exempt from sealing under subsections (4) and (6) and that pertain to a youth covered by this chapter must be physically sealed on the youth’s 18th birthday. In those cases in which jurisdiction of the court or any agency is extended beyond the youth’s 18th birthday, the records must be physically sealed upon termination of the extended jurisdiction.

(2)  Except as provided in subsection (6), when the records pertaining to a youth pursuant to this section are sealed, an agency, other than the department, that has in its possession copies of the sealed records shall destroy the copies of the records. Anyone violating the provisions of this subsection is subject to contempt of court.

(3)  Except as provided in subsection (6), this section does not prohibit the destruction of records with the consent of the youth court judge or county attorney after 10 years from the date of sealing.

(4)  The requirements for sealed records in this section do not apply to medical records, fingerprints, DNA records, photographs, youth traffic records, records in any case in which the youth did not fulfill all requirements of the court’s judgment or disposition, records referred to in 42-3-203, reports referred to in 45-5-624(7), or the information referred to in 46-23-508, in any instance in which the youth was required to register as a sexual offender pursuant to Title 46, chapter 23, part 5.

(5)  After formal youth court records, law enforcement records, and department records are sealed, they are not open to inspection except, upon order of the youth court, for good cause, including when a youth commits a new offense, to:

(a)  those persons and agencies listed in 41-5-215(2); and

(b)  adult probation professional staff preparing a presentence report on a youth who has reached the age of majority.

(6)  (a) When formal youth court records, law enforcement records, and department records are sealed under subsection (1), the electronic records of the management information system maintained by the department of public health and human services and by the department relating to the youth whose records are being sealed must be preserved for the express purpose of research and program evaluation as provided in subsection (6)(b).

(b)  The department of public health and human services and the department shall disassociate the offense and disposition information from the name of the youth in the respective management information system. The offense and disposition information must be maintained separately and may be used only:

(i)  for research and program evaluation authorized by the department of public health and human services or by the department and subject to any applicable laws; and

(ii) as provided in Title 5, chapter 13.

(7)  (a) Informal youth court records for a youth for whom formal proceedings have been filed must be physically sealed on the youth’s 18th birthday or, in those cases in which jurisdiction of the court or any agency is extended beyond the youth’s 18th birthday, upon termination of the extended jurisdiction and may be inspected only pursuant to subsection (5).

(b)  The informal youth court records may be maintained and inspected only by youth court personnel upon a new offense prior to the youth’s 18th birthday.

(c)  Except as provided in subsection (7)(a), when a youth becomes 18 years of age or when extended supervision ends and the youth was involved only in informal proceedings, informal youth court records that are in hard-copy form must be destroyed and any electronic records in the youth court management information system must disassociate the offense and disposition information from the name of the youth and may be used only for the following purposes:

(i)  for research and program evaluation authorized by the office of the court administrator and subject to any applicable laws; and

(ii) as provided in Title 5, chapter 13.

(8)  Nothing in this section prohibits the intra-agency use or information sharing of formal or informal youth court records within the juvenile probation management information system. Electronic records of the youth court may not be shared except as provided in 41-5-1524. If a person authorized under 41-5-215 is in need of a copy of a record that is in electronic form, the juvenile probation officer shall make only a physical copy of the record that is authorized and the person receiving the record shall destroy the record after it has fulfilled its purpose or as provided in subsection (2) of this section.

(9)  This section does not prohibit the intra-agency use or information sharing of formal or informal youth court records within the department’s youth management information system. Electronic records of the department’s youth management information system may not be shared except as provided in subsection (5). If a person authorized under 41-5-215 is in need of a copy of a record that is in electronic form, the department shall make only a physical copy of the record that is authorized and the person receiving the record shall destroy the record after it has fulfilled its purpose or as provided in subsection (2) of this section.

(10) This section does not prohibit the sharing of formal or informal youth court records with a short-term detention center, a youth care facility, a youth assessment center, or a youth detention facility upon placement of a youth within the facility.

(11) This section does not prohibit access to formal or informal youth court records, including electronic records, for purposes of conducting evaluations as required by 41-5-2003.

(12) This section does not prohibit the office of court administrator, upon written request from the department of public health and human services, from confirming whether a person applying for a registry identification card pursuant to [section 4 or 5] is currently under youth court supervision.”

Section 22.  Section 45-9-203, MCA, is amended to read:

“45-9-203.  Surrender of license. (1) If a court suspends or revokes a driver’s license under 45-9-202(2)(e), the defendant shall, at the time of sentencing, surrender the license to the court. The court shall forward the license and a copy of the sentencing order to the department of justice. The defendant may apply to the department for issuance of a probationary license under 61-2-302.

(2) If a person with a registry identification card issued pursuant to [section 4 or 5] is convicted of an offense under this chapter, the court shall:

(a) at the time of sentencing, require the person to surrender the registry identification card; and

(b) notify the department of public health and human services of the conviction in order for the department to carry out its duties under [section 12].”

Section 23.  Section 61-11-101, MCA, is amended to read:

“61-11-101.  Report of convictions and suspension or revocation of driver’s licenses — surrender of licenses. (1) If a person is convicted of an offense for which chapter 5 or chapter 8, part 8, makes mandatory the suspension or revocation of the driver’s license or commercial driver’s license of the person by the department, the court in which the conviction occurs shall require the surrender to it of all driver’s licenses then held by the convicted person. The court shall, within 5 days after the conviction becomes final, forward the license and a record of the conviction to the department. If the person does not possess a driver’s license, the court shall indicate that fact in its report to the department.

(2)  A court having jurisdiction over offenses committed under a statute of this state or a municipal ordinance regulating the operation of motor vehicles on highways, except for standing or parking statutes or ordinances, shall forward a record of the conviction, as defined in 61-5-213, to the department within 5 days after the conviction becomes final. The court may recommend that the department issue a restricted probationary license on the condition that the individual comply with the requirement that the person attend and complete a chemical dependency education course, treatment, or both, as ordered by the court under 61-8-732.

(3)  A court or other agency of this state or of a subdivision of the state that has jurisdiction to take any action suspending, revoking, or otherwise limiting a license to drive shall report an action and the adjudication upon which it is based to the department within 5 days on forms furnished by the department.

(4)  A conviction becomes final for the purposes of this part upon the later of:

(a)  expiration of the time for appeal of the court’s judgment or sentence to the next highest court;

(b)  forfeiture of bail that is not vacated; or

(c)  imposition of a fine or court cost as a condition of a deferred imposition of a sentence or a suspended execution of a sentence.

(5)  (a) On a conviction referred to in subsection (1) of a person who holds a commercial driver’s license or who is required to hold a commercial driver’s license, a court may not take any action, including deferring imposition of judgment, that would prevent a conviction for any violation of a state or local traffic control law or ordinance, except a parking law or ordinance, in any type of motor vehicle, from appearing on the person’s driving record. The provisions of this subsection (5)(a) apply only to the conviction of a person who holds a commercial driver’s license or who is required to hold a commercial driver’s license and do not apply to the conviction of a person who holds any other type of driver’s license.

(b)  For purposes of this subsection (5), “who is required to hold a commercial driver’s license” refers to a person who did not have a commercial driver’s license but who was operating a commercial motor vehicle at the time of a violation of a state or local traffic control law or ordinance resulting in a conviction referred to in subsection (1).

(6) (a) If a person who holds a valid registry identification card issued pursuant to [section 4 or 5] is convicted of or pleads guilty to any offense related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs when the initial offense with which the person was charged was a violation of 61-8-401, 61-8-406, or 61-8-410, the court in which the conviction occurs shall require the person to surrender the registry identification card.

(b) Within 5 days after the conviction becomes final, the court shall forward the registry identification card and a copy of the conviction to the department of public health and human services.”

NEW SECTION.  Section 24.  Repealer. The following sections of the Montana Code Annotated are repealed:

50-46-101.        Short title.

50-46-102.        Definitions.

50-46-103.        Procedures — minors — confidentiality — report to legislature.

50-46-201.        Medical use of marijuana — legal protections — limits on amount — presumption of medical use.

50-46-202.        Disclosure of confidential information relating to medical use of marijuana — penalty.

50-46-205.        Limitations of Medical Marijuana Act.

50-46-206.        Affirmative defense.

50-46-207.        Fraudulent representation of medical use of marijuana — penalty.

50-46-210.        Rulemaking — fees.

NEW SECTION.  Section 25.  Transition. (1) Registry identification cards issued to persons with debilitating medical conditions prior to [the effective date of this act] are valid until the expiration date listed on the card.

(2) A person who obtained a registry identification card as a caregiver pursuant to 50-46-103 before July 1, 2011, may not be in possession of marijuana plants, seedlings, cuttings, clones, usable marijuana, or marijuana-related products on July 1, 2011. Before July 1, 2011, the caregiver shall take the items to the law enforcement agency having jurisdiction in the caregiver’s area. The law enforcement agency shall destroy the items.

NEW SECTION.  Section 26.  Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 17] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 50, chapter 46, and the provisions of Title 50, chapter 46, apply to [sections 1 through 17].

COORDINATION SECTION.  Section 27.  Coordination instruction. (1) If both House Bill No. 161 and [this act] are passed and approved, then [this act] is void.

(2) If both House Bill No. 175 and [this act] are passed and approved and [this act] repeals 50-46-101, 50-46-102, 50-46-103, 50-46-201, 50-46-202, 50-46-205, 50-46-206, 50-46-207, and 50-46-210, then House Bill No. 175 is void.

NEW SECTION.  Section 28.  Instructions to code commissioner. (1) Wherever a reference to “medical use of marijuana” or “medical marijuana” appears in legislation enacted by the 2011 legislature, the code commissioner is directed to change the reference to “use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition”.

(2) Wherever a reference to 50-46-102 appears in legislation enacted by the 2011 legislature, the reference must be replaced with a reference to [section 2 of Senate Bill No. 423], if appropriate.

(3) Wherever a reference to 50-46-205 appears in legislation enacted by the 2011 legislature, the reference must be replaced with a reference to [section 7 of Senate Bill No. 423].

NEW SECTION.  Section 29.  Severability. If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.

NEW SECTION.  Section 30.  Effective date. [This act] is effective July 1, 2011.

– END –


Latest Version of SB 423 (SB0423.05)
Processed for the Web on April 11, 2011 (4:07pm)

New language in a bill appears underlined, deleted material appears stricken.

Sponsor names are handwritten on introduced bills, hence do not appear on the bill until it is reprinted.

See the status of this bill for the bill’s primary sponsor.

Status of this Bill | 2011 Legislature | Leg. Branch Home
All versions of all bills (PDF format)
Authorized print version of this bill w/line numbers (PDF format)
[ NEW SEARCH ]

Prepared by Montana Legislative Services
(406) 444-3064

News/Update from PATIENTS & FAMILIES UNITED

  • ALERT: Key House & Senate Votes Expected Tomorrow
  • Urge House & Senate NO Votes on SB 423 Conference Committee Report
  • Next Steps…

Key House & Senate Votes Expected Today, 4/20

In an irony as laden with sadness as SB 423 is with arbitrary and deliberately unworkable and punishing provisions, today, April 20, will likely be the day on which both the House and Senate vote on a “free conference committee” report that legislators completed just moments ago.

The SB 423 conference committee report puts “the finishing touches” on a bill we call “repeal in disguise” — and that others have called “the black market bill” — a bill literally intended to “get as close to repeal as possible.” Well, mission accomplished.

SB 423 would stick Montana with the very worst “medical marijuanalaw in the country. It is filled with arbitrary and extreme requirements intended to make it virtually impossible for patients with chronic pain to become legal — and to make it extremely unlikely that any approved patient will have reasonably reliable and consistent access to medicalgrade cannabis. Any physician making more than 15 recommendations within a year gets investigated, and pays for all the investigations. Chronic pain patients need two different physicians to do a complete exam unless they have “proof” of the “etiology” of their pain. Probationers are banned from eligibility, no matter how dire their medical need for cannabis. Federal medical privacy rights go out the window as local law enforcement is notified of every patient’s status. No one can grow for more than three patients, and people can’t grow cooperatively or efficiently at share! d locations. You grow either for infused (non-smokeable) products only, or for “bud” — not both. All growing and production must be “free.” You can never possess more than four “mature, floweringplants and up to 12 “seedlings” (no taller than 12 inches, after which they magically become “mature and flowering“), nor more than one ounce of cannabis. Labs for quality control are essentially banned.

SB 423 is literally designed to fail patients — not to work as voters intended.

(By the time floor votes on the conference committee report are held, a copy of the new bill should be available via the Legislature’s webpage. The conference committee adopted more than 160 amendments over the last several days.)

Urge House & Senate Members to Vote NO on SB 423

A recent poll by Mason-Dixon found that 87% of Montana voters want either no change or regulatory reform of the medical marijuana law. Montana voters DON’T want “repeal in disguise.”

And, while most agree that the law needs to be “fixed,” legislators SHOULD NOT accept SB 423’s punishing provisions simply because legislative leaders have not allowed alternatives to survive.

Please take a moment to send your own email to all members of both the House and Senate. You can copy and paste your personal message, which will be delivered to all 150 legislators, here:

http://www.montanadrugpolicy.org/alert/40

Next Steps…

If the conference committee report passes both the House and Senate, the bill will then go to the Governor for consideration. If his office formally receives it while the Legislature is still in session, one of his options will be to issue an “amendatory veto,” in which he could propose changes to SB 423 in a “take it or leave it” move. But if the Legislature has shut down by the time the bill gets to the Governor’s office, then his only choices would be to veto or accept the bill (with or without his actual signature).

Founded in early 2007, Patients & Families United works to support Montana’s medical marijuana patients, regardless of their medical condition, and pain patients, whether they use medical marijuana or not. Visit our website for background and information of use: http://www.mtpfu.org/. We welcome feedback of any kind, including stiff, honest criticism, but we reserve the right to remove from our mailing lists anyone who makes a habitual practice of sending threatening or irrational “flames.”]

© 2011 by Patients & Families United

Patients & Families United
PO Box 1471
Helena, MT 59624
http://www.mtpfu.org/

Heather Masterson (Montana NORML)

to mtnorml-list

show details 6:33 PM (13 hours ago)
Friends,It’s very likely that tomorrow 4/20, both the House and Senate will be voting on the SB423 “free conference committee” report that was completed by legislators earlier today.  This report puts “the finishing touches” on the bill that we refer to as “repeal in disguise” and others have called “the black market bill” because it will essentially, end Montana’s medical marijuana industry as we know it.If SB 423 passes, Montana will end up with one of the worst medical marijuana programs in the country.  Some of the awful provisions proposed include:* It makes it virtually impossible for patients with chronic pain to become legal.
* Any physician making more than 15 recommendations within a year gets investigated, and will be required to pay for all the investigations.
* Chronic pain patients need two different physicians to do a complete exam unless they have “proof” of the “etiology” of their pain.
* Probationers are banned from eligibility, no matter how dire their medical need for cannabis.
* It violates Federal medical privacy rights, as local law enforcement is notified of every patient’s status.
* Nobody can grow for more than three patients, and people can’t grow cooperatively or efficiently at shared locations.
* You grow either for infused (non-smokable) products only, or for “bud” – not both.
* All growing and production must be “free.”
* You can never possess more than four “mature, flowering” plants and up to 12 “seedlings” (no taller than 12 inches, after which they magically become “mature and flowering”), nor more than one ounce of cannabis.
* Labs for quality control are essentially banned.It’s criticalthat you urge the house and senate members to vote NO on SB 423, which is as easy as clicking this link:http://www.montanadrugpolicy.org/alert/40

After the vote, what’s next?
If the conference committee report passes both the House and Senate, the bill will then go to the Governor for consideration.  If his office formally receives it while the Legislature is still in session, one of his options will be to issue an “amendatory veto,” in which he could propose changes to SB 423 in a “take it or leave it” move.  But if the Legislature has shut down by the time the bill gets to the Governor’s office, then his only choices would be to veto or accept the bill (with or without his actual signature).

It’s not too early to urge the Governor to Veto SB 423 unless he is willing and able to transform it into regulation that will actually work for legitimate patients:

http://www.montanadrugpolicy.org/alert/39

You can make a difference.  Please, don’t delay and contact the legislature and the governor NOW!

--
Heather Masterson
Montana NORML - Working to reform marijuana laws in Montana.
Web: http://montananorml.org
Blog: http://blog.montananorml.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Montana-NORML/178715305628
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mtnorml

Patenting and or Trademarking Cannabis / Medical Marijuana Strains / Varieties Products or Services

After over 150 applications for trademarks under the U.S. Patent Office’s proposed “Processed plant matter for medicinal purposes, namely medical marijuanacategory, the agency has closed the category due to the, shall we say, ridiculous response.  The official reason is because the category was redundant with others, such as business names and manufacturing processes.

Many of the applications for trademarks fall under that former category, such as Colorado’s ReLeaf Center and Total Health Concepts, while some were for specific service names, like Nug Source (an ad company).  Foods incorporating marijuana were also a big item for trademark patent, including the now infamous “Dr. Canna Cola.”

The well-known Meyer Keegan from Colorado Springs might take the award for largest number of trademarks and patents applied for by a single individual in the now-defunct medical marijuana category.  Keegan applied for trademarks on many terms, such as “ganja,” “Maui Waui,” “Bubblegum,” “Island Sweet Skunk,” and other common strains and smoker terms.

Although the category has been stricken, businesses in the medical marijuana and related fields can still apply for patents and trademarks on their business names, proprietary product names, brands, etc. just as any other business does.  The removal of the controversial “medical marijuanacategory from the Trademark and Patent Office does not preclude these businesses from operating as would any other business in any other industry.

The so-far undecided patents that were filed with the TPO before closure of the category are still being vetted.  Most agree that while it was a nice try, most of Keegan’s attempts at claiming ownership of common names will probably fail.  So you won’t have to change your business or product names to avoid a lawsuit for using words like “ganja.”

http://www.uspto.gov/

United States Patent and Trademark Office

!!!Montana Biotech is NOW ACCEPTING PATIENTS!!!

If you have a qualifying medical condition, but cant afford the cost of MMJ registration, we may be able to help.

Wholesale prices are available for all of our products including a 90 day buy back guarantee. Please  feel free to contact us 24/7 with any questions.

Cell: 406-600-6871