UPDATE!! UPDATE Judge’s Ruling on SB-423 Injunction June 30, 2011 PDF UPDATE
We Have IT!! The Repeal / STOP SB 423 Medical Marijuana / Cannabis Reform Petition!! START Gathering Signature!!
Repeal of Montana’s Medical Marijuana / Cannabis Act SB 423 Injunction Hearing Final Day June 23rd, Helena Courtroom
LIVE Tweet FEED from the FRONT: Now Newest at top, DUHHH, way easier!!!
Molloy – against compensation. Families will provide
Says thers no big brother here gonna run wild
molloy says law enforce won’t interfere w good people
(That legislature needed intervention – batcrap crazy)
Molloy say granting injunction could b 2 much intervention w legislature
Not, he says, what initiative intended
Molloy – but this illegal & mt cgs marketed it 4 illegal consumption
Judge says profit drives everything
Refers 2 legal activity w which folks denied constitutional rites. Molloy says but fed illegal. Says profit motive has driven this.
Judge says once state steps in must b fair. Talks about rite 2 compensation 4 legal service. Not eve reimbursement allowed w sb 423
Molloy asks is ther a fundamental rite 2 certain meds? Tells of case wher answer is no. Example – no rite 2 experimental drugs/treatments
molloy says goetz acknowledged ther would b a challenge 2 repeal if it passed
3rd, the 25 patient trigger 4 physician investigations
Meaning unannounced inspection of peeps homes
But molloy says 3 provision can b enjoined w out 2 much trouble. One being advertising. Two being inspection provision
Molloy speaks 2 severability – says their job is 2 defend acts of legislature
Refers 2 moral or mythic reasons 4 treading on rites not good enuf
423 tread on fundamental rites says goetz
Goetz says rite 2 pursue health in mt constitution. Says sb 423 is a hammer going after a fly
Goetz says not about economic liberties but civil liberties.
Judge says legislature has rite 2 impose restrictions. Goetz agree
Judge says, state does intrude like takin away game farms, or no smoking in businesses
Goetz says but legislature deny rite 2 medication that works? Must show compelling state interest 2 deny or put undue restrictions o
Judge says legislature has right 2 change law (tho not constitution)
goetz says don’t need blanket exclusion of probationers. Can do case by case
goetz calls sb 423 a piece of sausage that didn’t turn out so tasty
Goetz says case @ core is about access
Yet don’t mind some provisions like telemedine ban or rules 4 minors, says goetz
Goetz hopes not 4 band-aid approach.
Judge says he may agree w some arguments or does goetz expect full out injunction. Goetz says unconst provisons r many
Judge asking how critical 4 answer by end of month. Goetz says critical, imperative
The state rests. End of witnesses
Sue steps down. No cross exam don’t think molloy got what he wanted out of that witness
Molloy asks sue 2 compare mt mmj law 2 other states. Dev objects. Judge sustains. Aboout mt constitution, not other states
Sue said if patient 2day, u would hav access 2 plants 2 buy from current cg b4 sb 423 goes inw effect
Judge asking molloy relevance of what sue thinks law means but allows line of questioning
Molloy asks sue 2 compare mt mmj law 2 other states. Dev objects. Judge sustains. Aboout mt constitution, not other states
Sue said if patient 2day, u would hav access 2 plants 2 buy from current cg b4 sb423 goes inw effect
Judge asking molloy relevance of what sue thinks law means but allows line of questionin
Molloy says transition 4 patients addressed in sb423. Sue says yes
Molloy flipping through notes
Sue describes provision. Basically sounding like hamp could grow 4 wife
Sue says provision tried 2 keep coop grows fr existing – peeps growing 2gether in 1 premise
Molloy asks about hamp who testified couldn’t grow 4 wife. Refers sue 2 kinship provision.
Judges decision seems 2 hav thrown off molloys game a little
Judge says can discuss ambiguous provisions only.
Here we go
Review: goetz & devlin= mtcia attorneys. Molloy & seacrest = lawyers 4 the state
Right now judge & lawyers talking about submitted documents & affidavits
Mark long, narc buruea chief in mt, returns 2 the stand. Refers 2 ”mmj crime” says mmj makes ptotecting public hard
Devlin begins cross x. Long says don’t recall if supported mmj iniative but probly not. Says been told mmj helps some peeps
Long says self & organization supported repeal
Long admits nvr grew med grade mm
Dev asks long, pose as patient ? Long, yes. Long went 2 carival clinic. Did not turn in doc 2 brd of med exam
Long says no expertise onrisks or benefits of mmj
Dev asks harmful effects if mmj legal? Long says kids gettin, drivin high, mold ingardens. Dev – any proof of mmj causing car accdents?
Long no, but not keeping records like we do 4 alcohol
Dev asks, main hazard of mmj that it illegal? Long doesn’t agree.
Dev asks questions comparing mmj 2 prescription drugs & alcohol. Molloy objects as irrelevent. Dev says it speaks 2 compelling state interest
Molloy says case not about mmj b legal. Judge says will allow questions
Long dodges questions on prescription drugs. Can’t speak 4 dept, (yet can 4 mmj)
Molloy objects again. This time sustained. Other drugs not relevant says judge
Dev pts out mmj makes finding grows easier. Long says yes but thers still illegal ones
Dev asks, u mentioned many offenses related 2 mmj. U prosecute these offenses? Yes. Dev – so u hav the tools
Molloy seems 2 sometimes signal long. Head shake kind of thing.
Long says not his job 2 interpret law but enforce
Long claims nvr said crime increased w mmj. Says only mmj crimes increased w mmj initiative
Of course this makes no sense. Ther was no mmj b4 initiative : also we all saw recent newstory when he said crime increase all over mt
Devlin reciting crime stats. Crime down. Mr. Long says yes, because we decriminalized some mmj offenses
Devlin – crime down since mmj laws in effect. Long – yes.
Molloy objects – says talkin crime stats is eatin valuable time & irrelevant
Judge sustains on grounds questions not relevant 2 this witness
Dev – mmj will b turned over 2 cops under sb 423? Long – hope so
Long – don’t know what med grade mmj is. Don’t know if it exists
Dev pts out that w sb 423 new patient must wait 3 – 6 mos 4 mmj
Long says can get it fr provider. Dev says how? Can’t hav it 2 provide til hav patients.
A little tense in here
Dev pts out that under sb423 patient can’t hav clones or seeds. Long agrees. Dev – so wher does plant come from?
Dev asking how 2 get mmj if no seeds or clones allowed?
Long – its legal to get a plant fr a provider 4 free. Dev – how can provider get it?
Dev askin under sb423 entire premises avail 4 inspect if growing mmj. Long, yes. (W sb 423, this means peeps homes largely). No warrent requir
Long says during session was representing narc officers ass not dept of justice
Molloy questioning long. Asks why not prosecute doc @ carnival clinic? Long says no criminal offense. Now describing carn clinic
Long says nvr more than a min w docs @ several clinics
Long says busting peeps 4 mj harder w mmj laws
Long steps down. Shakes molloys hand as he leaves stand. Sue oconnell gets sworn in
Sue worked ass off during session. Had 2 write all those mmj bills & amendments during session. Good & bad bills.
Molloy questioning sue about job duties
Sayin all records fr hearing & committees avail 2 public
Molloy gives sue binder of record fr 09 interim committee that dealt w mmj
Dev objecting. Sayin legislative process not relevant
Objecting 2 submission of documents, that is
Molloy wants demonstrate sb 423 result of thorough, rational process
The legislature a rational process – now that’s funny
Molloy says ters a rational relationship tween what leg considered & sb 423. Judge allows 4 documents 2 b submitted.
Smaller group 2day. 12 spectators. 7 press. 3 cameras
& we r back. Molloy questioning legislative staff member sue oconnell
Sue tells how interim committee took on mmj issue after seemed something needed 2 b done, mostly in response 2 traveling clinics
Sue tells bills that came out of comittee, incl hb 68 which was a regulatory bill that incl storefronts
Molloy asks sue what were legislators concerns. Devlin objects . Concerns r heresay, he says. Molloy w draws question
Molloy puts sb 423 in front of sue. Devlin objects. Says her interpretation of bill not what matters
Molloy says sue knows the intention of bill. Is relevant, he says. Dev says its improper 2 walk thru statute. Is irrelevant
Judge agrees. Sue s opinion about legislative intent just that. Molloy arguing the pt
Molloy says it speaks 2 whether tbers governmental interest thus can step in
Devlin says statute speaks 4 self. Would accept questions about ambiguous provisions but not clear ones
2 funny 2 try 2 argue that legislature was rational process & sb 423 the product of rational process.
callin that a rational process should discredit anybody
Judge sayin a lot of irrelevant info has been presented. Only about does statute violate mt constitution.
Medical Marijuana Preliminary Injunction Will Continue
Day 2: Montana Cannabis Industry vs. State of Montana
Medical Marijuana Regulation Controversy Plays out in Helena Courtroom: Group Asking Judge to Block New Law
Excess Medical Marijuana Could Be Headed For Black Market
Don’t Undermine the Medical Marijuana Industry
UPDATE Repeal SB423 Medical Cannabis / Marijuana Reform Petition UPDATE June 20th UPDATE
LIVE TWEETS from the FRONT: @Katecac follow on Twitter! To get UP-TO-THE-MINUTE UPDATES: Twitter.com : Follow @Katecac
UPDATE from the MTCIA June, 23rd 7:30 AM
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2011 From a Helena, Montana Courtroom: Final Day
The feeling in the air is that the severability issue will come into play with this court decision. Some provisions of SB 423 will be allowed to go into effect, some won’t. But it’s just a feeling in the air.
This morning, Mark Long, Narcotics Bureau Chief, will return to the stand. The state will continue its questioning of the witness and then MTCIA attorneys will cross-examine. Then, the state will call Sue O’Connell. Ms. O’Connell works for legislative services. During the 2011 session, everybody talked to Sue. She was the bill drafter for medical marijuana legislation. She’s been the one answering questions since the interim committee last summer. How will she serve the state’s case? Not sure.
Continue to follow @Katecac on http://Twitter.com for Tweets from the FRONT!!
Tuesday, June 21th, 2011 From a Helena, Montana Courtroom: Defense
Quick overview of Tuesday‘s courtroom volley… The plaintiffs sat their witnesses, today we get to hear from the defense! Kate Cholewa will be Tweeting again, LIVE!! Follow on Twitter!
Dr. Stowers continued testimony today with the MTCIA lawyer Mr. Devlin asking questions. Dr. Stowers continued in some of the same vein as Dr.Geci. The cross examining was Mr. Molloy for the defense. Mr. Molloy continued the questioning along the lines that patient DO have a primary physician, Dr. Stowers concedes, yes, but most primary physicians do not write medical cannabis recommendations. When asked if the doctor thinks if chronic pain is a condition medical marijuana is recommended too often for, his reply was emphatically NO!!!!
The next witness to the stand was Roy Kemp. Roy administers the medical cannabis program at the Department of Health and Human Services (DPHHS). Mr. Goetz asked Mr. Kemp if he sees unintended but unambigouos consequences of SB423. Roy agreed, and went further and said the provisions are without logical reason. Mr. Goetz then asks if a same sex partner was excluded from providing cannabis to their loved one. Unfortunately Mr.Kemp HAD to respond, yes.
Monday, June 20th, 2011 From a Helena, Montana Courtroom: Prosecution
Lester Grinspoon took the stand in a courtroom in Helena, Montana via Skype in defense of medical cannabis!! Cross examination started at ~11am. Keep here for the fastest blog in Montana!!
Molloy, the defense for the state, is trying to push the point of medical marijuana‘s illegality on the federal level. This is a shady move to say least!!!
MTCIA‘s lawyer, Mr. Goetz, began again after the lunch recess to put witnesses on the stand. This first day of testimony, June 20, is for the plaintiffs, in this case MTCIA and clients. Tomorrow, June 21, we will hear from the defense, the state! Keep UPDATED here at MontanaBiotech’s blog!
The first witness on the stand for MTCIA was, Wendy Gwimmer Oncology, social worker for four years, and a counselor since 1996. She spoke about sick patients having a tough time growing cannabis for themselves, DUH! The next witness to the stand for the plaintiffs was Mr. Hatfield. A patient, Mr. Hatfield, confessed a lack of ability with concern to horticulture and concedes SB 423 would leave him without access to his needed cannabis!
Mr. Goetz then called 79 year old, Mr. Hamp. Mr. Hamp currently caregivers for his wife who is suffering complications from her cancer diagnosis. He states that he currently acquires cannabis for his wife through commercial grow operations.
Mr. Molloy, a lawyer for the defense, tried to attest that his, Mr. Hamp‘s, family will provide for them. Mr.Hamp put forth that he in noway wants to put his family or friends in harms way by signing them up to be his wife’s caregiver.
Dr. Geci was next called to the stand. He is asked, is cannabis recognized as medicine, he responded in the affirmative. Why is it that no one under oath mentions the patent the Gov. has on cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotestants, I think that proves a medicinal efficacy of ALL cannabinoids!! Dr. Geci explained the endocannabinoid system and the effect of CBD, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid that contains plenty of therapeutic qualities on its own.
On cross examination Mr. Seacreast peppers Dr. Geci with incendiary, leading questions, has he been denied a license or had a license revoked in another state and how many patients has he personally sighed up for the current system. To these, Dr. Gecic answers a short no to the first series, and 800-1000 to the latter.
The last plaintiff of the day was Dr. John Stowers. He further characterized the clinic process for the court.
Cannabis TV Documentaries:
Marijuana: A Chronic History Presented by the History Channel
NGC’s Drugs Inc.: Marijuana
NGC’s Marijuana Nation
PBS’ Botany of Desire
CNBC’s Marijuana Inc.
TEA Party Eat your Heart Out!! The Bundy’s Were Here 1st!!
Peer Reviewed Research
MMJ Clinics / Doctors Recommendations
MMJ Dispensaries/Caregivers: Find Them Here
MMJ Strains / Varieties: Find Them Here Potency Tested
Ed Rosenthal Runs For President in 2012? Stephen’s Colbert SuperPac Funding?
Fastest way to determine cannabis seedling sex!
Grow Buddy Thin Layer Chromatography THC, CBD test kit
Grow Buddy Instructional Video
Grow Buddy Replacement T.L.C. Supplies
Plant DNA Collection Kit
Montana Biotech Products and Services
Specialist Want Regulations / Oversight of Medical Marijuana Analysis Labs, Montana Biotech Embraces Open Dialog
Cannalytics™ Cannabinoid Fingerprinting Test by Alpha Nova vs Grow Buddy™ at Home THC, CBD, CBN Test Kit by Montana Biotech Comparing Two Competing Thin Layer Chromatography T.L.C Methods
QUALTITATIVE vs. QAUNTITATIVE Analysis of Cannabis THC, CBD, CBN Cannabinoid Levels
Ed Rosenthal and the Party-Party’s Platform for America 2012!
A Little Ed History and Education! Wiki Style!
Call Montana Biotech today for more information on setting up a Grow Room Help or consultation!
Donate to Cannabis Research at Montana Biotech